Add wrappers for PyEval_EvalCode*, Py_CompileString* Python C API
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start by locating Boost.Python's existing string-based and file-based evaluation methods, then trace their wrapper entry points. Compare the available Python C API functions PyEval_EvalCode*, Py_CompileString*, and the requested compile-and-evaluate workflow; done means the corresponding wrappers are exposed with coverage for their intended use.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
It would be nice to have API to follow "compile and eval" way. Currently Boost.Python provides only string-based or file-based evaluation methods.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 537
- Forks
- 223
- Avg merge
- 11h 22m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from boostorg/python
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
-
BoostDetectToolset-1.90.0.cmake file not found in an include() call in boost_python-config.cmake Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100