[Website] Track post-OINK improvements
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- web-dev
Research direction
This is a parent coordination issue rather than an implementation task. Start with the OINK 1.0 migration in #466 and the GitHub sub-issues for UI direction and the community contributor showcase; use those child scopes and acceptance criteria to identify actionable work. The parent is done when required child issues are complete or explicitly deferred.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Goal
Coordinate the website improvements that follow the OINK 1.0 migration in #466.
This parent issue is the single place to review scope, progress, dependencies, and decisions. Implementation remains in focused child issues.
Child workstreams
- UI direction and visual evolution
- Community contributor showcase
Progress is tracked through GitHub sub-issues below. Add future website follow-ups here only when they have a clear scope and acceptance criteria.
Coordination
- Keep user-facing behavior, screenshots, and design decisions in the relevant child issue.
- Summarize cross-cutting decisions and blockers on this parent issue.
- Close this parent after every required child issue is complete or explicitly deferred.
- Treat unrelated documentation content and release-validation work as separate scopes.
Background
The OINK 1.0 migration was delivered by #466. The production migration itself is complete; this issue tracks subsequent website improvements rather than reopening the migration.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 71
- Forks
- 125
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 28
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apache/hugegraph-doc
-
enhancement
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
apache/hugegraph-doc#467 · 13 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
apache/hugegraph-doc#495 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
apache/hugegraph-doc#491 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 42/100
apache/hugegraph-doc#471 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Roadmap] Documentation hub for HugeGraph Rust modernizationPossibly taken @FenjuFu claimed this 66 days ago. Openenhancement help wanted
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
apache/hugegraph-doc#462 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in apache/hugegraph-doc
Similar issues
-
docs(types): update the collection binding note now that typed collections shipped in pycubrid 1.9.0Opendocumentation priority: low size: S
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
cubrid-lab/sqlalchemy-cubrid#768 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 65/100
ansys/pydpf-core#3547 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
core
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
vectorize-io/hindsight#5457 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug]: LangChain drops OpenAI Responses text blocks from session recordingPossibly taken @ktz03 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
volcengine/OpenViking#5806 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day