[Bug]: Beam SQL Parquet tables fail on TIME columns: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
Research direction
Start with AvroUtils.getFieldSchema and genericFromBeamField, where the issue identifies the missing TIME identifier handling, and compare them with the DATE conversion paths. Read the Beam SQL TIME mapping in CalciteUtils and inspect the Avro time-millis/time-micros conversions. Add a JUnit regression test under sdks/java/extensions/sql using the DirectRunner repro; done means TIME values can be written to and read back from a Parquet table. The Avro time unit choice needs maintainer guidance.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
What happened?
A Beam SQL Parquet table (CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ... TYPE parquet) with a TIME column can't be written. On master (b0c68c4a4f7), the INSERT fails with:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
Minimal repro, run as a JUnit test in sdks/java/extensions/sql with the DirectRunner (p is a TestPipeline):
BeamSqlEnv env = BeamSqlEnv.inMemory(new ParquetTableProvider());
env.executeDdl("CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE t (c TIME) TYPE parquet LOCATION '/tmp/time-table/'");
BeamSqlRelUtils.toPCollection(p, env.parseQuery("INSERT INTO t VALUES (TIME '12:34:56')"));
p.run().waitUntilFinish(); // RuntimeException: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
Calling AvroUtils.toAvroSchema on the table's schema, which is what ParquetTable does (L60, L69, L111), throws the same exception.
Cause. The two sides use different identifiers for TIME:
- Beam SQL maps
TIMEtoFieldType.logicalType(SqlTypes.TIME), whose identifier isbeam:logical_type:time:v1(CalciteUtils L114). AvroUtils.getFieldSchemaonly recognizes the legacy"TIME"identifier (L1224). Every other identifier falls through to theUnhandled logical typeexception (L1242).genericFromBeamFieldhas the same gap (L1389, L1406).
DATE does handle both identifiers: "DATE".equals(identifier) || SqlTypes.DATE.getIdentifier().equals(identifier) (L1220). That's why DATE columns work and TIME columns don't.
Expected: TIME columns can be written and read back. The CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE docs list DATE, TIME, TIMESTAMP as supported Parquet types.
A fix probably needs a design call. Should SqlTypes.TIME (a java.time.LocalTime) map to Avro time-micros (long) or time-millis (int)? Reading the column back also has to convert to LocalTime, and the time-millis/time-micros branches of the Avro-to-Beam conversion currently return the raw int/long. I'm happy to send a fix once a maintainer confirms which mapping they'd like.
For reference, here is what AvroUtils.toAvroSchema produces today for each type, from a temporary test that runs CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ... TYPE parquet for each column type:
| Beam SQL type | Beam field type | Avro type |
|---|---|---|
| TINYINT, SMALLINT, INTEGER | BYTE, INT16, INT32 | int |
| BIGINT | INT64 | long |
| FLOAT | FLOAT | float |
| DOUBLE | DOUBLE | double |
| DECIMAL | DECIMAL | bytes (decimal) |
| BOOLEAN | BOOLEAN | boolean |
| DATE | SqlTypes.DATE | int (date) |
| TIME | SqlTypes.TIME | exception |
| TIMESTAMP | DATETIME | long (timestamp-millis) |
| CHAR, VARCHAR | STRING | string |
| BINARY, VARBINARY | BYTES | bytes |
Several rows of the docs' Parquet type table don't match this: the int types, FLOAT, DATE and TIME. I'll file that docs correction separately.
Issue Priority
Priority: 2 (default / most bugs should be filed as P2)
Issue Components
- Component: Python SDK
- Component: Java SDK
- Component: Go SDK
- Component: Typescript SDK
- Component: IO connector
- Component: Beam YAML
- Component: Beam examples
- Component: Beam playground
- Component: Beam katas
- Component: Website
- Component: Infrastructure
- Component: Spark Runner
- Component: Flink Runner
- Component: Prism Runner
- Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner
- Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 8.7k
- Forks
- 4.8k
- Avg merge
- 2d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 368
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apache/beam
-
awaiting triage bug P3
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 67/100
apache/beam#41197 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug]: [Python] WriteToJson silently rounds floats to 10 decimal placesPossibly taken @Abhi2939 claimed this 1 day ago. Openio P2 python yaml
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
apache/beam#41102 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
apache/beam#39624 · 2 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug]: PubsubIO used in batch incorrect batch cutoff sizePossibly taken @1fanwang claimed this 78 days ago. Openbug io P3 pinned pubsub
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
apache/beam#28011 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
build P3 sub-task
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
SasanLabs/VulnerableApp#912 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
desktop edt not responding
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
datafusion-contrib/StreamFusion#653 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] Absolute row/column index 0 is ignored for images, hyperlinks and commentsPossibly taken @fanOfSunny claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day