[Bug]: Beam SQL Parquet tables fail on TIME columns: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 48/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with AvroUtils.getFieldSchema and genericFromBeamField, where the issue identifies the missing TIME identifier handling, and compare them with the DATE conversion paths. Read the Beam SQL TIME mapping in CalciteUtils and inspect the Avro time-millis/time-micros conversions. Add a JUnit regression test under sdks/java/extensions/sql using the DirectRunner repro; done means TIME values can be written to and read back from a Parquet table. The Avro time unit choice needs maintainer guidance.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What happened?
A Beam SQL Parquet table (CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ... TYPE parquet) with a TIME column can't be written. On master (b0c68c4a4f7), the INSERT fails with:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
Minimal repro, run as a JUnit test in sdks/java/extensions/sql with the DirectRunner (p is a TestPipeline):
BeamSqlEnv env = BeamSqlEnv.inMemory(new ParquetTableProvider());
env.executeDdl("CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE t (c TIME) TYPE parquet LOCATION '/tmp/time-table/'");
BeamSqlRelUtils.toPCollection(p, env.parseQuery("INSERT INTO t VALUES (TIME '12:34:56')"));
p.run().waitUntilFinish(); // RuntimeException: Unhandled logical type beam:logical_type:time:v1
Calling AvroUtils.toAvroSchema on the table's schema, which is what ParquetTable does (L60, L69, L111), throws the same exception.
Cause. The two sides use different identifiers for TIME:
- Beam SQL maps
TIMEtoFieldType.logicalType(SqlTypes.TIME), whose identifier isbeam:logical_type:time:v1(CalciteUtils L114). AvroUtils.getFieldSchemaonly recognizes the legacy"TIME"identifier (L1224). Every other identifier falls through to theUnhandled logical typeexception (L1242).genericFromBeamFieldhas the same gap (L1389, L1406).
DATE does handle both identifiers: "DATE".equals(identifier) || SqlTypes.DATE.getIdentifier().equals(identifier) (L1220). That's why DATE columns work and TIME columns don't.
Expected: TIME columns can be written and read back. The CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE docs list DATE, TIME, TIMESTAMP as supported Parquet types.
A fix probably needs a design call. Should SqlTypes.TIME (a java.time.LocalTime) map to Avro time-micros (long) or time-millis (int)? Reading the column back also has to convert to LocalTime, and the time-millis/time-micros branches of the Avro-to-Beam conversion currently return the raw int/long. I'm happy to send a fix once a maintainer confirms which mapping they'd like.
For reference, here is what AvroUtils.toAvroSchema produces today for each type, from a temporary test that runs CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE ... TYPE parquet for each column type:
| Beam SQL type | Beam field type | Avro type |
|---|---|---|
| TINYINT, SMALLINT, INTEGER | BYTE, INT16, INT32 | int |
| BIGINT | INT64 | long |
| FLOAT | FLOAT | float |
| DOUBLE | DOUBLE | double |
| DECIMAL | DECIMAL | bytes (decimal) |
| BOOLEAN | BOOLEAN | boolean |
| DATE | SqlTypes.DATE | int (date) |
| TIME | SqlTypes.TIME | exception |
| TIMESTAMP | DATETIME | long (timestamp-millis) |
| CHAR, VARCHAR | STRING | string |
| BINARY, VARBINARY | BYTES | bytes |
Several rows of the docs' Parquet type table don't match this: the int types, FLOAT, DATE and TIME. I'll file that docs correction separately.
Issue Priority
Priority: 2 (default / most bugs should be filed as P2)
Issue Components
- Component: Python SDK
- Component: Java SDK
- Component: Go SDK
- Component: Typescript SDK
- Component: IO connector
- Component: Beam YAML
- Component: Beam examples
- Component: Beam playground
- Component: Beam katas
- Component: Website
- Component: Infrastructure
- Component: Spark Runner
- Component: Flink Runner
- Component: Prism Runner
- Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner
- Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 8.7k
- Fork
- 4.8k
- Merge medio
- 2g 9h
- PR unite (30g)
- 368
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/beam
-
Release notes links wrongApertaawaiting triage bug P3
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 67/100
apache/beam#41197 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: [Python] WriteToJson silently rounds floats to 10 decimal placesForse già presa @Abhi2939 l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertaio P2 python yaml
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
apache/beam#41102 · 4 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
apache/beam#39624 · 2 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]: PubsubIO used in batch incorrect batch cutoff sizeForse già presa @1fanwang l’ha presa 78 giorni fa. Apertabug io P3 pinned pubsub
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
apache/beam#28011 · 4 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
build P3 sub-task
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 68/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Issue simili
-
Enhancing the Issue TemplateAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
SasanLabs/VulnerableApp#912 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
desktop edt not responding
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
datafusion-contrib/StreamFusion#653 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug] Absolute row/column index 0 is ignored for images, hyperlinks and commentsForse già presa @fanOfSunny l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno