chore(build): the feature matrix lives only in a 1,088-line hand-enumerated Makefile
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- build-system, ci-cd
Research direction
Start by comparing the Makefile targets build, test, clippy, doc, and test-embedded with the CI calls in ci.yml at commit d9c7be0. Map the existing feature combinations and check whether any are missing from a target, then inspect the crate manifests to identify declared features. Choose one of the suggested approaches and add a check that every declared feature appears in at least one tested combination.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
Makefile is 1,088 lines, and most of it is hand-written cargo build|test|clippy|doc|check --package … --features "…" lines, one per crate and feature combination, repeated across the build, test, clippy, doc and test-embedded targets. CI calls these targets (make clippy, make test, make test-embedded, make check, make all), so the Makefile is the only place the supported feature matrix is written down.
Consequences:
- Adding or renaming a feature means editing the same combination in up to five targets, plus the crate manifest. Nothing checks that the five stay aligned, so a combination can be built but not linted, or linted but not documented.
- The matrix cannot be read by tools (e.g. to check that every declared feature is exercised at least once).
- It is the main reason the deprecated feature aliases are still in use in-tree.
Suggested work
Options, roughly in order of effort:
- Define each crate's feature combinations once as Make variables and have
build/test/clippy/dociterate over them. - Move the matrix into a small data file (TOML) consumed by an
xtaskor script, with the Makefile targets as thin wrappers. - Use
cargo hack --feature-powerset(with exclusions) for the host crates and keep explicit lists only for the embedded targets.
Whatever the choice, add a check that every feature declared in a crate manifest appears in at least one tested combination.
Notes
Based on reading the Makefile and ci.yml at d9c7be0. I did not check for combinations that are already missing from one of the targets; that would be a useful first step.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 101
- Forks
- 20
- Avg merge
- 2h 33m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 90
Getting set up
Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from aimdb-dev/aimdb
-
🏷️ good first issue enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
dependencies
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 44/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Panic on live viewport resize when unstyled elements exist in display: none subtreePossibly taken @GoCoder7 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
DioxusLabs/blitz#1488 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
S-Needs triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
vectordotdev/vrl#2042 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day