Markup inside the PDF's validation section in the table of content
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- wasm
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Inspect how the PDF table of contents is generated, focusing on the Validation → Types → Function Types entry and the [t1n] [syntax/types:syntax-functype] [t2m] child node. Compare the affected proposals, including the wasm v3 draft, with the intended TOC output; done means the markup tokens no longer appear in the generated PDF.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
As the title states, there is some markup in the TOC, like for example in Validation->Types->Function Types there is a single child node named "[t1n] [syntax/types:syntax-functype] [t2m]". This is sins quite a while, and is in many different proposals, including the wasm v3 draft. I think it is a markup spill.
- Dominant language
- WebAssembly
- Stars
- 3.5k
- Forks
- 539
- Avg merge
- 10h 38m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from WebAssembly/spec
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
WebAssembly/spec#2258 · 4 comments · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 58/100
WebAssembly/spec#2253 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[spectec] Wasm 1.0: `$instantiate` missing premisesPossibly taken @rossberg claimed this 26 days ago. Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
WebAssembly/spec#2245 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
WebAssembly/spec#2235 · 9 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
WebAssembly/spec#2196 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in WebAssembly/spec