Hosted gem `rollback` / `remove` strips the `DEPENDENCIES` `!` of a gem the user declared inside a `source "https://rubygems.org" do` block, so every frozen install fails after the unwind
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 80/100
Research direction
Start at crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs around line 354. The strip_suffix('!') call needs a guard: only drop the ! when the restored Gemfile no longer declares the gem inside a source block (or with a source:/git:/path: option). Check how the original Gemfile context is tracked during unwind. Run the project's test suite, and verify with the repro steps in the issue that a frozen install succeeds after rollback.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
[agent] Found by the scheduled Bundler (RubyGems) bug-hunt routine (ledger #316).
Summary
Bundler marks a dependency declared inside a source … do block with ! in the lock's DEPENDENCIES (colorize (= 0.8.1)!), even when that block's source is rubygems.org. The hosted scan of such a gem works: it nests the patch-registry block inside the user's block, and the fresh frozen install gets the patched bytes. The unwind (rollback, or remove <purl>) then restores the Gemfile byte for byte, so the declaration is back inside the user's source "https://rubygems.org" do block. But the unwind always drops the ! from the lock's DEPENDENCIES line. The restored pair no longer matches what Bundler writes, so BUNDLE_FROZEN=true bundle install fails with exit 16 ("Your lockfile needs to be updated, but it can't be because frozen mode is set"). rollback still reports success with hosted.reverted: [pkg:gem/[email protected]].
Impact
After undoing a patch, every CI or deployment (frozen) install of the project breaks until someone runs an unfrozen bundle install and commits the lock. The unwind is supposed to give back the original, installable pair.
Repro (Linux, Ruby 3.3.6, Bundler 4.0.22 or 2.6.9 with bundle lock --add-checksums)
Patch API and patch registry mocked on loopback (the run-13 mock from ledger #316); rubygems.org is the real upstream.
mkdir app && cd app
printf 'source "https://rubygems.org"\n\ngem "rake"\nsource "https://rubygems.org" do\n gem "colorize", "0.8.1"\nend\n' > Gemfile
bundle lock && cp Gemfile.lock /tmp/orig.lock # DEPENDENCIES: colorize (= 0.8.1)!
socket-patch scan --mode hosted --yes --api-url $MOCK --org org --api-token fake
BUNDLE_FROZEN=true BUNDLE_PATH=vb bundle install # exit 0, patched bytes (OK)
socket-patch rollback --api-url $MOCK --org org --api-token fake --patch-server-url $MOCK
diff /tmp/orig.lock Gemfile.lock
# < colorize (= 0.8.1)!
# ---
# > colorize (= 0.8.1)
git diff Gemfile # empty: the Gemfile came back exactly
BUNDLE_FROZEN=true BUNDLE_PATH=vb2 bundle install # exit 16
socket-patch remove pkg:gem/[email protected] leaves the same diff, and a frozen install then fails with exit 16 too.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT.md's "Hosted unwind coverage" gem row says the unwind undoes the
source "<patch registry>" do … endblock and "the pair comes back". The!should only be dropped when the restored declaration no longer sits in a usersourceblock (the case where hosted mode added it). Here the declaration's own block still pins the source, so the original!must stay, and the lock should come back byte-identical to the pre-scan one. - Actual: the
!is always removed (the row says "theDEPENDENCIESpin loses its!" without exception), which leaves a pair that Bundler's frozen mode rejects.
Matrix
| OS | Ruby | Bundler | Shape | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 4.0.22 | top-level source + source "https://rubygems.org" do gem … end |
reproduces (×2) |
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 4.0.22 | every gem inside one source "https://rubygems.org" do block |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 4.0.22 | source … do + nested group :default do |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 2.6.9 (CHECKSUMS added) | every gem inside one source block |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 4.0.22 | remove <purl> instead of rollback |
reproduces |
| Linux | 3.3.6 | 4.0.22 | plain top-level declaration (control) | pass (lock byte-restored) |
macOS and Windows weren't probed. The lock surgery is OS-independent.
First bad version
Not bisected. This is current main d47eab3; the v5 upstream restore introduced the hosted unwind.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/upstream/gem.rs:354: for a non-transitive gem, entry.strip_suffix('!') unconditionally rewrites the DEPENDENCIES line to the unpinned form. It doesn't check whether the restored Gemfile still declares the gem inside a source … do block (or with a source: / git: / path: option), and in that case Bundler keeps the !.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 19h 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 421
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#896 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:uv priority:p1
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 28/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1374 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in SocketDev/socket-patch
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
NuSkooler/enigma-bbs#907 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
EasyTier/EasyTier#2672 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
XmlFragment children, successors and siblings stop at the first child that is not an XML typePossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
repowise-dev/repowise#3374 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day