Question regarding completion-signatures-for vs completion_signatures_of_t
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by comparing the specification definitions of completion-signatures-for and completion_signatures_of_t, then trace the referenced get_completion_signatures lookup and the member function's return type. Done means documenting their distinct roles and resolving whether the proposed logic is correct; no source file or test is named in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
What is the difference between these two types in the spec?
I'm going under the assumption that they are defined separately because completion_signatures_of_t relies on get_completion_signatures which checks the return type of the member function with the same name, and completion-signatures-for is supposed to be used as a return type for that member function.
If the above is correct, should completion-signatures-for use the same logic as get_completion_signatures, but without the member function check?
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 270
- Avg merge
- 2d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 43
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from NVIDIA/stdexec
-
inline_scheduler's namespace-scope static_assert fails under nvcc (private nested __sender access) Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
google/libultrahdr#485 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
godotengine/godot#123776 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 60/100
-
good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
ros2/common_interfaces#344 ·