CreateTeamDto.createdById is taken from the request body, so a caller can create a team owned by someone else
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 75/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- typescript
Research direction
Start with TeamsService.create in src/teams/teams.service.ts, then read CreateTeamDto and the controller in the paths named in the issue. Check the existing team service specs and how member IDs are validated. Done means a request cannot choose an arbitrary team owner, and a service spec covers a body-supplied createdById that differs from the caller.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Location — src/teams/teams.service.ts:38-43 (TeamsService.create), DTO field src/teams/dto/create-team.dto.ts:49-52 (CreateTeamDto.createdById), controller src/teams/teams.controller.ts:43.
Problem — The authenticated caller's id is used only as a fallback for a client-supplied value:
const team = await this.teamRepo.save(
this.teamRepo.create({
name: dto.name?.trim() ?? dto.name,
// Fall back to the authenticated caller's id when the client omits createdById.
createdById: dto.createdById ?? callerUserId,
}),
);
CreateTeamDto.createdById is validated as @IsOptional() @IsUUID() and nothing else. There is no check that it equals user.userId from @CurrentUser(), and no check that the referenced user even exists (the existence loop above only validates members[].userId, not createdById). So any caller holding SPONSOR or MAINTAINER can set createdById to an arbitrary UUID.
Why it matters — Team.createdById is the only ownership field on the entity. Issue #357's fix made it the fallback owner precisely so a team cannot be created with no owner, and it is the field any ownership check on PATCH /teams/:id/splits or POST /teams/:id/assign/:bountyId must key on. Letting the client choose it means:
- The audit trail is wrong: a team whose splits pay out real money is attributed to a user who never created it, and the real creator leaves no record anywhere.
- It pre-breaks the ownership checks this field exists to support. Once a check of the form
team.createdById === callerIdis added, a caller can still hand ownership to an account they control, or — in the other direction — plant a team attributed to a victim so the victim appears responsible for its payout terms. - Passing an unknown UUID is also accepted; because
Team.createdByisonDelete: 'SET NULL'/nullable: true, there is no FK rejection path that reliably catches it at insert time for an id that does not exist, so the team can end up with a dangling owner id (the condition #357 set out to prevent).
Reproduction / failure path
- Authenticate as user A (SPONSOR). Note A's id.
POST /teamswith body{"name":"t","createdById":"<user B's uuid>","members":[{"userId":"<A>","percentage":100}]}.- Returns 201 with
createdByIdset to B. Nothing links the team to A. - Repeat with a random UUID that belongs to no user — also accepted.
Suggested fix
- Remove
createdByIdfromCreateTeamDtoentirely and setcreatedById: callerUserIdunconditionally in the service. The caller id is already available and is the only trustworthy source. - If an admin-on-behalf-of flow is genuinely needed, keep the field but accept it only when the caller holds
UserRole.MAINTAINER, and validate the referenced user exists with the same batched existence check used for members; otherwise reject withForbiddenException. - Add a service spec asserting that a body-supplied
createdByIddifferent from the caller's id does not end up on the saved entity.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 90
- Avg merge
- 31m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from MergeFi/backend
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug testing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
zapcooking/frontend#946 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
WiliamRosa/cosmos-semantic-platform#40 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
liberation-data/drivine#733 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
makecindy/cindy#10062 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day