CreateTeamDto.createdById is taken from the request body, so a caller can create a team owned by someone else
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 75/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
Direzione di ricerca
Start with TeamsService.create in src/teams/teams.service.ts, then read CreateTeamDto and the controller in the paths named in the issue. Check the existing team service specs and how member IDs are validated. Done means a request cannot choose an arbitrary team owner, and a service spec covers a body-supplied createdById that differs from the caller.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Location — src/teams/teams.service.ts:38-43 (TeamsService.create), DTO field src/teams/dto/create-team.dto.ts:49-52 (CreateTeamDto.createdById), controller src/teams/teams.controller.ts:43.
Problem — The authenticated caller's id is used only as a fallback for a client-supplied value:
const team = await this.teamRepo.save(
this.teamRepo.create({
name: dto.name?.trim() ?? dto.name,
// Fall back to the authenticated caller's id when the client omits createdById.
createdById: dto.createdById ?? callerUserId,
}),
);
CreateTeamDto.createdById is validated as @IsOptional() @IsUUID() and nothing else. There is no check that it equals user.userId from @CurrentUser(), and no check that the referenced user even exists (the existence loop above only validates members[].userId, not createdById). So any caller holding SPONSOR or MAINTAINER can set createdById to an arbitrary UUID.
Why it matters — Team.createdById is the only ownership field on the entity. Issue #357's fix made it the fallback owner precisely so a team cannot be created with no owner, and it is the field any ownership check on PATCH /teams/:id/splits or POST /teams/:id/assign/:bountyId must key on. Letting the client choose it means:
- The audit trail is wrong: a team whose splits pay out real money is attributed to a user who never created it, and the real creator leaves no record anywhere.
- It pre-breaks the ownership checks this field exists to support. Once a check of the form
team.createdById === callerIdis added, a caller can still hand ownership to an account they control, or — in the other direction — plant a team attributed to a victim so the victim appears responsible for its payout terms. - Passing an unknown UUID is also accepted; because
Team.createdByisonDelete: 'SET NULL'/nullable: true, there is no FK rejection path that reliably catches it at insert time for an id that does not exist, so the team can end up with a dangling owner id (the condition #357 set out to prevent).
Reproduction / failure path
- Authenticate as user A (SPONSOR). Note A's id.
POST /teamswith body{"name":"t","createdById":"<user B's uuid>","members":[{"userId":"<A>","percentage":100}]}.- Returns 201 with
createdByIdset to B. Nothing links the team to A. - Repeat with a random UUID that belongs to no user — also accepted.
Suggested fix
- Remove
createdByIdfromCreateTeamDtoentirely and setcreatedById: callerUserIdunconditionally in the service. The caller id is already available and is the only trustworthy source. - If an admin-on-behalf-of flow is genuinely needed, keep the field but accept it only when the caller holds
UserRole.MAINTAINER, and validate the referenced user exists with the same batched existence check used for members; otherwise reject withForbiddenException. - Add a service spec asserting that a body-supplied
createdByIddifferent from the caller's id does not end up on the saved entity.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 2
- Fork
- 90
- Merge medio
- 31m
- PR unite (30g)
- 20
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Nessuna guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di MergeFi/backend
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug security
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug testing
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 85/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug security
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di MergeFi/backend
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
zapcooking/frontend#946 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
WiliamRosa/cosmos-semantic-platform#40 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 77/100
liberation-data/drivine#733 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
makecindy/cindy#10062 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno