Benchmarks

Open
#19 3 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

@schneiderfelipe is already working on this.

Since May 18, 2021.

  • #33 by @schneiderfelipe — open

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
julia
Domain
performance

Research direction

Start with AcuteML.jl's src/xmlutils and review the equivalent Hyperscript and EzXML/libxml2 operations to compare. Define representative benchmark cases, run them for the relevant packages, and document whether Hyperscript offers performance or other advantages; the issue is complete when the comparison and results are recorded.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Is there any benchmark for using Hyperscript compared to EzXML (libxml2) for example?

I have made a package called AcuteML that defines a couple of XML utilities for manipulating DOM:
https://github.com/aminya/AcuteML.jl/tree/master/src/xmlutils

I wanna know if Hyperscript offers more performance or other advantages over other packages.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
105
Forks
12
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from JuliaWeb/Hyperscript.jl

All issues in JuliaWeb/Hyperscript.jl

Similar issues

More Julia issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.