Large negative real number arguments return NaN for expintx

Open
#457 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
julia
Domain
backend

Research direction

Start by reproducing expintx(complex(-x)) with x above roughly 700, then inspect the expintx implementation and its suspected expinti path. No file or test is named in the issue; done means these large negative real arguments no longer return NaN and the behavior is covered by an appropriate regression test.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

expintx(complex(-x)) returns NaN for x more than around 700. It's almost like this is being handled by -exp(-x)*expinti(x) and we're getting an overflow error.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
384
Forks
115
Avg merge
1d 13h
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from JuliaMath/SpecialFunctions.jl

All issues in JuliaMath/SpecialFunctions.jl

Similar issues

More Julia issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.