Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Issues with differentiating with respect to polynomial coefficients

Open
#578 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
38/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
julia
Domain
tooling

Research direction

Start by running the provided Polynomials and ForwardDiff example and inspect how Polynomial(x) and ForwardDiff.gradient interact when trailing coefficients are zero. Compare the reported gradients with true_∇f(x); done means the zero-coefficient cases produce the expected coefficient derivatives without breaking the existing examples.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

I am interested in taking the derivative of a polynomial with respect to its coefficients. When the coefficients are such that all terms of order $n \ge k$ for some $k$ are 0, automatic differentiation packages return 0 as the derivative with respect to those coefficients. Of course, the true derivative of $\beta_0 + \beta_1 x + \cdots + \beta_K x^K$ with respect to $\beta_n$ should be $x^n$.

Here is an example:

using Polynomials
using ForwardDiff

f(x) = Polynomial(x)(0.5)
∇f(x) = ForwardDiff.gradient(f, x)
true_∇f(x) = 0.5.^(0:length(x)-1)

all_params = [[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], [1.0, 0.0, 3.0], [1.0, 0.0, 0.0]]
for param in all_params
    println("Params are $(param).") 
    println("Gradient from ForwardDiff: $(∇f(param))") 
    println("True gradient: $(true_∇f(param))")
    println("")
end

The output from this example is below. Note the issue in the final example.

Params are [1.0, 2.0, 3.0].
Gradient from ForwardDiff: [1.0, 0.5, 0.25]
True gradient: [1.0, 0.5, 0.25]

Params are [1.0, 0.0, 3.0].
Gradient from ForwardDiff: [1.0, 0.5, 0.25]
True gradient: [1.0, 0.5, 0.25]

Params are [1.0, 0.0, 0.0].
Gradient from ForwardDiff: [1.0, 0.0, 0.0]
True gradient: [1.0, 0.5, 0.25]

Is there a way to avoid this issue?

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
321
Forks
81
Avg merge
10h 1m
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from JuliaMath/Polynomials.jl

All issues in JuliaMath/Polynomials.jl

Similar issues

More Julia issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.