Fingerprint the record shapes the specification defines, with a format-status record per family
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
A pull request for this has already been merged.
- #285 by @kikashy — merged
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- github-actions, python
- Domain
- build-system, testing-qa
Research direction
Start by reading the schema definitions, release records in releases/, and the CI workflow that verifies committed change records. Identify how to normalize schemas and track each record family's draft, compatibility, and released versions. Done when unrecorded schema changes fail CI and the status records agree with releases/.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
The specification byte-pins its releases and its frozen Policy artifacts, but the record formats it defines (the decision record and audit chain, dialect recordings, workflow outputs, receipts as consumed) have no mechanical guard on their shapes between releases.
What it adds
- A generated catalog of the record shapes the specification defines: each schema's normalized form and a SHA-256 digest, with an inventory, checked in and verified in CI against committed change records.
- A format-status record per record family: the version the draft text writes, the last accepted compatibility baseline, the last released version (pre-releases included).
- Implementations (runtime, runner, gateway, agent) can compare their own catalogs with this one: a mismatch is a conformance finding.
Acceptance
- A schema change without a change record fails CI; the status records are consistent with
releases/.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 6h 15m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 98
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#282 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#275 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Cover a rule's or an exception's reference list written without its array, or with a repeated entryOpengood first issue
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 76/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#158 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 8/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#287 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec#286 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack-spec
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] vllm-sr config migrate drops providers.models[].deploymentPossibly taken @Bevisy claimed this today. Openneeds-acceptance wg/developer-experience-ecosystem
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
vllm-project/semantic-router#5996 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
bugfix low-priority plugin:abstract plugin:leyline small-effort source:discussion
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
athola/claude-night-market#1132 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
WeblateOrg/language-data#2773 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
kind/bug priority/medium qa_automation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#37324 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day