Remove internal leftovers from the repository
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- github, typescript
- Domain
- documentation, security
Research direction
Start by scanning the working tree for internal tracker keys, hostnames, working notes, and German or mixed-language text; the issue does not name specific files or tests. Then scan the full git history for secrets with a tool such as gitleaks. Done when the acceptance grep finds no old tracker keys or internal hostnames outside the changelog and the history scan is clean.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Goal
The public repository should contain only things that make sense to an outside reader.
Tasks
- Find and remove or rewrite internal references: references to private systems, internal hostnames, internal project tracker keys (for example
CR-nn) in documentation, code comments, test names, and commit-derived docs where they confuse outsiders. Link to GitHub issues instead where a reference is still useful. - Remove working notes and spike data that are not useful to the public, or move them into clearly labeled
docs/pages with context. - Scan the full git history and the working tree for accidentally committed secrets before the public announcement (the tracked-secrets scan in CI helps; also run a history scan with a tool such as gitleaks).
- Replace German or mixed-language leftovers with English.
Acceptance criteria
A grep for the old tracker key pattern and internal hostnames returns nothing outside of the changelog, and the history scan is clean.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1h 15m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 217
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from ExpidetGames/code-reviewer
-
area: app type: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
ExpidetGames/code-reviewer#308 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
type: docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ExpidetGames/code-reviewer#94 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
ExpidetGames/code-reviewer#401 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area: app type: chore
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
ExpidetGames/code-reviewer#393 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area: runner type: bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
ExpidetGames/code-reviewer#390 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in ExpidetGames/code-reviewer
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Chocobozzz/PeerTube#7832 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Pay to use?Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 66/100
darkreader/darkreader#16108 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Add: Dak Nong TV SDOpencheck:passed streams:add
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug engine
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
frostney/GocciaScript#1746 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 67/100
agilepathway/label-checker#739 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day