Murfey for CryoCLEM
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100
Research direction
The issue contains no description, files, tests, entry points, or acceptance criteria. Start by clarifying what “Murfey for CryoCLEM” should support with the maintainers; the implementation area and definition of done cannot be identified from the issue alone.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue has no description.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from DiamondLightSource/python-murfey
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
All issues in DiamondLightSource/python-murfey
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#172 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main Openarea: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness#4207 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ClickHouse/clickhouse-connect#1057 ·