Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Consider Blob.fromStream (returns a Promise<Blob>)

未关闭
#140 7 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
html
领域
api, web-dev

调研方向

该 issue 没有指出任何仓库文件或测试。首先比较此处描述的当前 Blob、ReadableStream 和 Response(...).blob() API;要完成这项工作,需要先确定 Blob.fromStream 的 API 设计、其选项以及相关的 File 问题,然后编写适用的规范和一致性测试。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

feature request TPAC2024

I'm filing this as a tracking issue, although I don't think it's particularly urgent. But maybe web developers have run into this more, in which case hearing from them would be great.

Anyway, right now, to convert a ReadableStream to a Blob, you have to do

const blob = await new Response(stream).blob();

which is pretty silly. Just as blob.stream() was added to avoid the silly new Request(blob).body pattern, perhaps we should consider adding a promise-returning Blob.fromStream() so you could do

const blob = await Blob.fromStream(stream);

There is a bigger savings if we add an options parameter:

const blob1 = new Blob([await new Response(stream).blob()], options);
const blob2 = Blob.fromStream(stream, options);

Points to consider:

  • We could instead make this stream.toBlob(), but I feel the layering of keeping streams ignorant of blobs is a bit cleaner.
  • We may not want to introduce this because it's better if people avoid using blobs? (Or is it just blob URLs that we dislike?)
  • If someone wanted a File, we could either add File.fromStream(stream, fileName, options) or we could have people do new File([Blob.fromStream(stream)], fileName, options). Probably File.fromStream() is nicer.
  • This does not allow creating a blob that represents an "in progress" stream, which I've heard people have wanted in order to have self-referential blobs. That would require new concepts and infrastructure. This proposal is basically just exposing existing infrastructure in a more straightforward way.
主要语言
HTML
星标
118
派生
52
平均合并
9 天 16 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

w3c/FileAPI 的其他 Issue

查看 w3c/FileAPI 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Backend & API Design Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。