Auth: Expose the per-request Better Auth instance to server routes
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 18/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- api, authentication
调研方向
Start with the void/auth exports getUser, getSession and requireAuth, and with runVoidAuthMiddleware, which stores the per-request Better Auth instance under the Hono context key __voidAuth. The issue asks for a supported accessor such as getAuth(c) plus a decision on whether /.well-known/ OAuth discovery paths should be forwarded. Done means the maintainers have chosen an approach and a route can get the instance without the private key.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
I'd like a supported way to get the Better Auth instance that Void creates for the
current request, so that server routes can pass it to Better Auth plugin helpers.
Today void/auth exports getUser(), getSession() and requireAuth(), which cover
user and session checks, but it doesn't export the instance itself.
The only way I've found to reach the instance is to read the internal Hono context key "__voidAuth",
which isn't documented and could change in any release.
Use case
My app is an MCP server that uses Better Auth's OAuth provider, with the jwt() and
mcp() plugins from @better-auth/mcp. Several pieces of that setup need the
Better Auth instance as an argument, so I can't write them with the current
void/auth exports:
- The MCP route wraps its handler with
requireMcpAuth(auth, handler, options)from
@better-auth/mcp, which checks the OAuth access token on each request. - MCP clients fetch OAuth discovery documents at the site root, e.g.
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcpand
/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server/api/auth. Void only forwards
/api/auth/*to Better Auth, so I added a route underroutes/.well-known/that
passes these requests toauth.handler(request). - My sign-in and consent page loaders use
auth.$contextto count users through
the database adapter, because the app allows only one account.
Current workaround
I read the instance from the Hono context in one helper function, and every route
calls that helper:
import type { Context } from "hono";
import type { betterAuth } from "better-auth";
type AuthInstance = ReturnType<typeof betterAuth>;
export function getAuthInstance(c: Context): AuthInstance {
const auth = c.get("__voidAuth") as AuthInstance | undefined;
if (!auth) {
throw new Error('Void did not provide a Better Auth instance at "__voidAuth".');
}
return auth;
}
The workaround depends on runVoidAuthMiddleware, which calls
c.set("__voidAuth", auth) in Void's Better Auth runtime code. I checked that the key
is the same in 1.2.1 and 1.4.0. If the key is renamed, my MCP endpoint, the discovery
documents and the sign-in page all stop working, and the type cast means nothing
catches it at build time.
Proposal
I'd like void/auth to export a function that returns the current request's
instance, with the same request handling as requireAuth(c). For example:
import { getAuth } from "void/auth";
export const POST = defineHandler(async (c) => {
const auth = getAuth(c);
return requireMcpAuth(auth, handleMcpRequest, { resource })(c.req.raw);
});
I'd also like the return type to include the plugins from auth.ts, the same way
AuthUser and AuthSession now include plugin fields in 1.4.0, so that the
endpoints plugins add under auth.api type check without a cast.
If Void prefers not to expose the instance, I could instead use built-in support for
the two OAuth needs above. That would mean forwarding the /.well-known/ OAuth
discovery paths to Better Auth when the mcp() or oauthProvider() plugin is
enabled, and adding a documented way to protect a route with an OAuth access token.
Environment
- void 1.4.0, @void/svelte 1.4.0
- better-auth 1.7.12, @better-auth/mcp 1.7.12
- Native Cloudflare deploy (Workers and D1)
Disclaimers
Written by Claude Opus 5, reviewed and edited by Humans.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 627
- 派生
- 66
- 平均合并
- 14 小时 17 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 200
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
voidzero-dev/void 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
voidzero-dev/void#718 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
voidzero-dev/void#717 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 28/100
voidzero-dev/void#692 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 30/100
voidzero-dev/void#689 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
`withValidator({ body })` rejects the multipart bodies that `useForm` and `action()` send for files未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
voidzero-dev/void#679 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 voidzero-dev/void 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
appandflow/stim#5258 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area/docs framework/hugo help wanted language/markdown
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 68/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#33660 · 1 条评论 · 5 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
drizzle-team/drizzle-orm#6639 ·
维护者通常 4 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100