Add OpenSSF Scorecard analysis to GitHub Actions
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 55/100
调研方向
Start by reading the repository's existing GitHub Actions workflows and identify the CI workflow for the default branch. Add a separate workflow that runs OpenSSF Scorecard on pushes and weekly, then uploads its report as an artifact; check the Actions run and artifact to confirm completion. The issue does not name workflow files or tests.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The repository currently lacks an automated assessment of its security posture against industry-recognized open-source security best practices. While the project may include testing and CI workflows, there is no continuous evaluation of repository security, dependency management, workflow security, or software supply chain practices. This makes it difficult to identify areas where the repository can improve its overall security posture.
Proposed Solution
Integrate the OpenSSF Scorecard GitHub Action into the existing CI pipeline.
The workflow should:
- Run automatically on pushes to the default branch.
- Execute on a scheduled basis (e.g., weekly).
- Analyze the repository against OpenSSF security best practices.
- Generate a detailed security score and recommendations.
- Upload the generated report as a GitHub Actions artifact.
- Optionally publish results to GitHub's Security tab where supported.
- Ensure the workflow runs independently without disrupting existing CI jobs.
This will provide maintainers with continuous insights into the repository's security posture and highlight actionable improvements.
Alternatives Considered
An alternative is to manually review the repository against OpenSSF recommendations or use external security assessment tools periodically. However, this approach is time-consuming, inconsistent, and may fail to detect newly introduced security weaknesses. Automating the assessment ensures continuous monitoring with minimal maintenance effort.
Additional Context
OpenSSF Scorecard is a widely adopted DevSecOps tool that evaluates repositories against established security best practices. Integrating it into the CI pipeline will strengthen software supply chain security, improve repository transparency, and help maintainers proactively address potential security gaps as the project evolves.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 36
- 派生
- 234
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
utksh1/SecuScan 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:beginner priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
comp/desktop P3 type/feature
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#154285 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
docs: qualify copied and custom kubectl debug policy notes可能已有人在做 @nym01 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
kubescape/cel-admission-library#166 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
SACGF/variantgrid#2804 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[BUG] HTTP lifecycle dispatch treats a NO_PROXY-only environment as corporate egress and skips the resolve-and-pinned session可能已有人在做 @bodapatisaikrishna 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复