test : add unit tests for _check_field helper in validation
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- #2342 来自 @tmdeveloper007 —— 已关闭，未合并
评估
调研方向
Read backend/secuscan/validation.py and follow _check_field's string, list, and other-value paths. Add testing/backend/unit/test_validation_check_field.py with the listed boundary, pass-through, and error-message cases, using settings for limits. Run the new unit tests and confirm they cover each case; issue #2342 has a closed, unmerged pull request, so check its changes before starting.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary of What Needs to be Done:
Add unit tests for the _check_field helper function in backend/secuscan/validation.py. This private function validates individual input field values (strings and lists) against length limits. It is the core of the validate_task_start_payload function and has distinct logic paths for string vs list values.
Changes that Need to be Made:
- Add a new file
testing/backend/unit/test_validation_check_field.py - Import
_check_fieldandsettingsfrombackend.secuscan.validation - For string values:
- Test string at exactly max length passes
- Test string exceeding max length returns 400 with appropriate message
- Test string well under limit passes
- For list values:
- Test list at exactly max array length passes
- Test list exceeding max array length returns 400
- Test list with items exceeding max field length returns 400
- Test list with all items within limits passes
- For non-string/non-list values:
- Test returns (True, 0, '') for unexpected types (pass-through)
- Test that error messages do not echo back field values
- Test with edge case: empty string ("") passes
- Test with edge case: empty list ([]) passes
Impact that it would Provide:
- Provides granular coverage for the field-level validation logic
- Ensures string length and array length limits are enforced correctly
- Guards against regression as settings limits are adjusted
Note: This task is being handled by tmdeveloper007 — please assign to that account when picking it up.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 36
- 派生
- 234
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
utksh1/SecuScan 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:beginner priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
area:frontend good first issue level:intermediate priority:low type:testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
comp/desktop P3 type/feature
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#154285 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
docs: qualify copied and custom kubectl debug policy notes可能已有人在做 @nym01 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
kubescape/cel-admission-library#166 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
SACGF/variantgrid#2804 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[BUG] HTTP lifecycle dispatch treats a NO_PROXY-only environment as corporate egress and skips the resolve-and-pinned session可能已有人在做 @bodapatisaikrishna 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复