[2.0 / next] Error formatting and async iterator protocol failures escape memo error handling
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 22/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- javascript, typescript
- 领域
- frontend
调研方向
The async escape sites are in packages/signals/src/core/async.ts around the iterator advancement code (it.next(), isThenable(step), settled.then) and the deferred iterable detection near line 704 and its fulfillment callback near line 737. The formatting failure is in StatusError construction in packages/signals/src/core/error.ts near line 49. Start by reproducing with the linked playgrounds, then route the unguarded protocol calls into the memo's error handler. Done when the boundary shows the error for each of the four variants and the controls still pass.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Describe the bug
Some operations Solid performs while processing memo results can throw outside the memo's error handling.
After an async iterator yields, a synchronous throw from a later next() or from the next step's then escapes as an unhandled rejection. The memo keeps its last value and <Errored> never shows its fallback. Iterator setup can escape similarly when a promise resolves to an iterable, leaving <Loading> stuck.
There is also a synchronous escape in error formatting: constructing StatusError can throw out of createMemo(...), replacing the original compute error and aborting initialization.
Your Example Website or App
https://s.olid.uk/id/S8TyGqCDTL-vlxyOuHwbPw
Steps to Reproduce the Bug or Issue
No interaction is needed in these playgrounds:
- Later
next()throws: open the main repro. After 500 ms it yields1, thennext()throwsnext failed. The page stays atValue: 1; the console reports an uncaught promise error instead of the boundary displayingError: next failed. - Next step's
then()throws: https://s.olid.uk/id/0ZuFYcLwRBODdfMqTy5O6A — the same sequence leavesValue: 1and reportsthen failedoutside the boundary. - Deferred iterator setup throws: https://s.olid.uk/id/4U4U3cPFRrSbzA3_uDZLnQ — an async memo resolves to an iterable whose iterator factory throws. The console reports
iterator failed, while the page stays onLoading.... - Error formatting throws: https://s.olid.uk/id/EtxIswRlT8Ct_xJIWyzIDg — the memo throws a null-prototype object, but formatting it throws a
TypeErrorout ofcreateMemo. The enclosing boundary receives that secondary error, and creation never returns an accessor.
Controls: in the first two examples, return Promise.reject(new Error(...)) from the failing next() branch instead of throwing during the protocol operation. The boundary then displays the error. In the third, throw directly from the async memo after the delay. In the fourth, replace Object.create(null) with {}; the boundary receives the original object.
Expected behavior
Async protocol failures should reach the owning memo's error handler and boundary, as rejected iterator steps already do. A failure should not leave stale content or loading state behind while only producing an unhandled continuation rejection.
Error formatting should also be handled deliberately: best-effort formatting could preserve the original compute error, or a failure considered fatal could deliberately halt. Currently formatting aborts memo creation and the enclosing computation receives a secondary exception.
Screenshots or Videos
No response
Platform
- OS: Linux
- Browser: Chromium 154.0.8037.57
- Solid: hosted playgrounds pinned to
next@d5e32a9af41c7bfe0bc090f7438ee4297d540b17. - Rechecked against current
next@ccd99481deed3ebb567ee11ab7a152ced84d122b, using Chromium with bundles compiled directly from source in both development and production configurations.
Additional context
Verified the following escape variants on current next in both configurations, using native promises for the asynchronous delivery:
| Operation | When | Result |
|---|---|---|
next getter or next() call throws |
After an async yield | Unhandled rejection; last value remains |
Next step's then getter or then() call throws |
After an async yield | Unhandled rejection; last value remains |
[Symbol.asyncIterator] getter or factory throws |
After a promise resolves to an iterable | Unhandled rejection; memo never delivers an error |
First next() throws |
During that deferred iterator setup | Same |
Thrown value cannot be stringified, or its toString, Error.message getter, or message conversion throws |
During initial compute-error handling | Secondary exception escapes createMemo |
The controls are contained correctly: throwing then getters/methods and iterator factory/next() calls during the initial synchronous computation; later rejected next() promises; and an ordinary async generator throwing after a yield. Across 17 cases per configuration, the seven async escape variants produced the original error as an unhandledrejection but never invoked the memo's error callback. The four formatting variants escaped creation. All six controls delivered the original error. Unrelated reactive updates continued in the escape cases; no deliberate halt occurred. The hosted rejection controls also show their <Errored> fallbacks correctly.
Suspect sites:
- Iterator advancement and step assimilation:
it.next(),isThenable(step), andsettled.then(...)are unguarded. The initial call is protected by the compute catch, but later calls run from an async continuation. - Deferred iterable detection and its fulfillment callback: reading/calling the iterator protocol and its first pull can throw after the original compute catch has exited. These user-protocol operations need error routing at the asynchronous call sites, alongside the existing rejection handlers.
- StatusError construction: message extraction and conversion run inside error handling without their own guard. #3886 contains this candidate, which fixes the four checked formatting variants:
- super(original instanceof Error ? original.message : String(original), {
- cause: original
- });
+ let message: string | undefined;
+ try {
+ message = String(original instanceof Error ? original.message : original);
+ } catch {}
+ super(message, { cause: original });
The formatting change does not address the separate async protocol escape sites. Their failures need to reach the memo's error machinery rather than escape the continuation.
Related: #2918 explicitly handles throwing then getters/methods for actions with await semantics; #2869 fixed synchronously delivered iterator rejections. These memo cases concern throws while invoking the protocol, rather than a rejection delivered through it. #2840 establishes original-error identity. The formatting candidate comes from #3886 and was outside #4085's held-error scope.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 36.1k
- 派生
- 1.1k
- 平均合并
- 11 小时 32 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 356
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
solidjs/solid 的其他 Issue
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 14/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 18/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 22/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 15/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6872 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
fab-geocommuns/RNB-site#539 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
Guest multiview tile label leaks raw virtual-source-id "Whip" instead of the guest name / slot label未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
Eyevinn/open-live-studio#211 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
documentation good first issue
难度 2/5 半天 新手友好度 72/100
sujithputta02/Esapay#13 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhuild#468 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复