For index accessors stay stale after an optimistic reorder when the mutation is a router action
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 50/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- frontend
调研方向
Run the provided TypeScript reproduction and compare the router action path with the plain async and nested Solid action variants. Trace the interaction among the router action/query, createOptimisticStore, and For index accessors; the fix is done when the settled list reads b:0 a:1 c:2 and the optimistic overlay is removed after the action.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Describe the bug
When a Solid action reorders rows in an optimistic store optimistically and then calls a router action, the rows move but For's index accessors do not, and they never update afterwards. After the router action finishes and the query behind the store refetches, the list shows the new order with the old indexes (b:1 a:0 c:2) until the page is reloaded. Any code that uses i() then targets the wrong row. In a kanban board this disabled the "move up" button on the wrong card and computed wrong drop positions.
Every piece of the repro is needed. The same reorder recovers correctly (indexes are stale only during the transition, then correct) when:
- the mutation is a plain async function followed by
revalidate(getCards.key)instead of a routeraction, - the mutation is a nested Solid
actionthat callsrevalidate(getCards.key), - the optimistic store derives from a plain
createMemo(async …)instead of a routerquery.
Without the optimistic write (just the router action, then the list re-renders from the refetched query), the indexes are also correct.
Your Example Website or App
The component below. It needs no server functions: the query and the router action are both client-side.
Steps to Reproduce the Bug or Issue
With @solidjs/[email protected], solid-js/@solidjs/web 2.0.0-rc.9 and @solidjs/[email protected] (client start mode):
import { action as routerAction, createRouter, query, useAction } from "@solidjs/router";
import { action, createMemo, createOptimisticStore, For, Loading } from "solid-js";
type Card = { id: string; order: number };
let db: Card[] = [{ id: "a", order: 0 }, { id: "b", order: 1 }, { id: "c", order: 2 }];
const wait = (ms: number) => new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, ms));
const getCards = query(async () => {
await wait(20);
return db.map(c => ({ ...c }));
}, "cards");
const swapOnServer = routerAction(async () => {
await wait(150);
const [x, y] = [...db].sort((p, q) => p.order - q.order);
db = db.map(c => (c.id === x.id ? { ...c, order: y.order } : c.id === y.id ? { ...c, order: x.order } : c));
}, "swap");
function Cards() {
const data = createMemo(() => getCards());
const [cards, setCards] = createOptimisticStore(() => data(), [] as Card[]);
const sorted = () => [...cards].sort((x, y) => x.order - y.order);
const call = useAction(swapOnServer);
const swap = action(function* () {
setCards(list => {
const [x, y] = [...list].sort((p, q) => p.order - q.order);
const t = x.order;
x.order = y.order;
y.order = t;
});
yield call();
});
return (
<>
<button onClick={() => swap()}>swap</button>
<ul>
<For each={sorted()}>{(r, i) => <li>{r.id}:{i()}</li>}</For>
</ul>
</>
);
}
const Router = createRouter({ routes: [{ path: "/", component: Cards }] });
export default function App() {
return <Router>{props => <Loading fallback={<p>…</p>}>{props.children}</Loading>}</Router>;
}
- Load the page. The list reads
a:0 b:1 c:2. - Click
swap. The list immediately readsb:1 a:0 c:2. - Wait. It still reads
b:1 a:0 c:2indefinitely.
The same happens when the router action is a "use server" function returning reload({ revalidate: [getCards.key] }), returning nothing, or returning a value, and with singleFlight: false. It also happens in the production build, and on 2.0.0-next.28.
Expected behavior
b:0 a:1 c:2 once the action settles, as with the plain-async and nested-Solid-action variants above.
Screenshots or Videos
No response
Platform
- OS: macOS 15 (arm64)
- Browser: Chromium 151 (Playwright headless shell)
- Node: 24.21.0
- Versions:
@solidjs/router2.0.0-next.30 (also 2.0.0-next.28),solid-js/@solidjs/web/@solidjs/signals2.0.0-rc.9,@solidjs/vite-plugin3.0.0-next.44, Vite 8.3.0
Additional context
I have not traced the root cause. The stale value is For's index accessor (solid-js), but only the router action path leaves it stuck: a nested Solid action doing the same mutation and revalidate recovers. A related symptom in the same setup: if the router action resolves without changing the data (for example it returns new Error("rejected"), the documented validation pattern), the optimistic store overlay itself is never dropped and keeps showing the rejected reorder. That may share a cause; I can file it separately.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 1.3k
- 派生
- 180
- 平均合并
- 1 天 7 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 21
环境准备
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
solidjs/solid-router 的其他 Issue
-
Optimistic store write is never reverted when a router action resolves without changing the data未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
solidjs/solid-router#620 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
<A> costs ~6us of server CPU per instance during SSR (20x a plain <a>), mostly mergeProps/splitProps未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
solidjs/solid-router#583 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
solidjs/solid-router#569 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 38/100
solidjs/solid-router#518 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 64/100
solidjs/solid-router#502 · 4 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 solidjs/solid-router 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
opengovsg/FormSG#10118 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ai-driven-qa bug claude
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 75/100
linagora/twake-calendar-frontend#1434 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
check:passed streams:add
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 半天 新手友好度 78/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4512 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area:ide documentation enhancement platform:macos platform:vscode
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
anthropics/claude-code#97389 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复