Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Why tokenizer.pad_token == args.pad (i.e., 50256)??

未关闭
#57 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
python

调研方向

Start with jaxformer/hf/sample.py around lines 234 and 240 to inspect how tokenizer.pad_token and pad_token_id are passed during sampling. Then compare that procedure with the single-turn HumanEval setup used for the paper's Table 1 results; done means the padding behavior and benchmark discrepancy are explained.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Hi,

For my project, I'm trying to fine-tune CodeGen models on my dataset and evaluate the resulting fine-tuned model on the HumanEval benchmark dataset. I have a few questions that I would appreciate if you could address.

  1. First, why in the sampling code, at line 234, we have tokenizer.pad_token == args.pad, which is 50256. Shouldn't we set the pad_token to eos_token, not 50256 (which is the eos_token_id)? I'm confused by this. At line 240, you set the parameter pad_token_id=args.pad. So in your sampling code, both pad_token and pad_token_id are set to 50256. Can you please elaborate on this? That would be super helpful.

  2. As a baseline, I need to replicate your single-turn HumanEval benchmark results, but unfortunately, I'm getting surprisingly lower results compared to what is reported in the paper. And, I'm 99% positive that I'm probably missing a point. To produce Table 1 results in the paper, did you use the exact same sampling procedure as sample.py?

Thanks a lot for your time.

主要语言
Python
星标
5.2k
派生
420
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

salesforce/CodeGen 的其他 Issue

查看 salesforce/CodeGen 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。