Inspect numbered params or the default block param
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Reproduce the issue in the debugger using numbered block parameters and the default block parameter it, then compare evaluation through eval, binding, and the debugger prompt. Done means these parameters can be inspected without rewriting the block to use named arguments.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this. I've searched the web, asked AI, asked on a few Ruby forums and searched the issues on this repo.
The numbered block params (_1, _2, ...) and the new default block param (it) cannot be inspected in the debugger. I've tried various things such as:
- Using eval -
eval('it') - Inspecting
binding - Assigning to a value at the debugger prompt (
v = it)
Nothing seems to work. I generally have to update the code to use traditional named block args which is sort of annoying and makes me not want to use it even though I otherwise love it.
Am I missing something or is this just a current deficiency in the debugger?
- 主要语言
- Ruby
- 星标
- 1.3k
- 派生
- 146
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
ruby/debug 的其他 Issue
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
-
Support exceptionOptions in setExceptionBreakpoints to catch arbitrary exception classes via DAP 未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 45/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 52/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
相似的 Issue
-
SyncEm always forwards a dummy block, so wrapped methods lose their no-block/Enumerator behavior 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
endoflife-date/endoflife.date#11086 ·
-
internal
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7322 ·
-
bug P2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100