open-like access
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
No files or tests are named. Start by reviewing the package's current cache access and iterator behavior, then compare the requested API with Python's builtin open parameters; done means defining supported behavior, preserving one file version during iteration, and raising NotImplementedError for unsupported operations.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Another feature I would like is an API like the builtin open. This is less urgent, and does not even need to be part of this package. If you are not keen, it can exist only in coala.
It might seem a little strange to rewrap the cache in a file open-like API, but it helps ensure our access is strictly an iteraror, and it means the semantics are familiar and not tied to this implementation. The iterator needs to ensure one version of the file is processed, even if the file has been modified, and thus the cache is invalidated.
It can, and should, raise exceptions such as NotImplementedError for open parameters that are not able to be provided for the wrapped file cache object, or the operation is possible but not yet built because it is non-trivial to build properly.
Again, I am happy to build if you are happy for this feature to reside in your package.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 5
- 派生
- 4
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
相似的 Issue
-
essnmx good first issue
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 95/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 条评论 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success 未关闭area: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·