`(() :> string)` compiles, and other coercions and variant spreads treat `bool` and `unit` as variants
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- javascript, ocaml
- 领域
- compilers
调研方向
Start with Variant_coercion.can_try_coerce_variant_to_primitive and type_is_variant in compiler/ml/variant_coercion.ml, then trace subtype_rec in Ctype and constructor spreading in compiler/ml/variant_type_spread.ml. Reproduce the coercion and spread cases from the issue, then run the compiler tests that cover variant coercions and spreads. Done means bool and unit values retain correct runtime behavior and invalid coercions are rejected; pull request #9218 is already open.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
unit can be coerced to string, a closed polymorphic variant whose tags are "true", "false" or "()" can be coerced to bool or unit, and bool or unit can be spread into a variant. The coercions compile to nothing, so undefined gets the type string, and a string gets the type bool or unit. The compiler also suggests these coercions: let s: string = u() for u: unit => unit is reported with "These types are compatible at runtime. You can use the coercion operator to convert to the expected type: (u() :> string)", and let b: bool = p for p: [#"true" | #"false"] with (p :> bool).
let s: string = (() :> string)
let n = s->String.length
let n = undefined.length;
let s;
Loading the module throws TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'length'). The subtype check accepts unit for string wherever it compares the two: (f :> string => string) for f: string => unit, (g :> unit => int) for g: string => int, (p :> promise<string>) for p: promise<unit>, and a unit in a tuple, a record or object field or a constructor payload.
let toBool = (p: [#"true" | #"false"]): bool => (p :> bool)
let answer = toBool(#"false") ? "yes" : "no"
let isFalse = toBool(#"false") == false
function toBool(p) {
return p;
}
let isFalse = "false" === false;
let answer = "yes";
toBool(#"false") returns the string "false", which is truthy and is not false, so answer is "yes" and isFalse is false. In the same way, let u: unit = (p :> unit) for p: [#"()"] makes u the string "()", and u == () is false.
A variant that spreads bool builds true and false, but its switches and coercions take them for the strings "true" and "false":
type t = | ...bool | Other
let x: t = true
let s = (x :> string)
let r = switch x { | true => "yes" | false => "no" | Other => "other" }
let r;
switch (true) {
case "false" :
r = "no";
break;
case "true" :
r = "yes";
break;
case "Other" :
r = "other";
break;
}
let x = true;
let s = true;
r is undefined, and s is the boolean true typed as a string. On master, a variant that spreads unit builds undefined for (), and its switch compares undefined === "()"; 13.0.0-alpha.6 and earlier build the string "()" there.
Some coercions of unit that are rejected give reasons that do not apply to it. (() :> int) says "The constructor () of variant unit has no @as payload, which makes it a string at runtime", ("a" :> unit) says "Fix this by adding the @unboxed attribute to the variant unit", and on master (() :> unknown) says that the variants have different @unboxed configurations.
bool and unit are declared in compiler/ml/predef.ml as variants with the constructors false, true and () and no @as, but their values are false, true and undefined. Variant_coercion.can_try_coerce_variant_to_primitive in compiler/ml/variant_coercion.ml leaves out bool but not unit, so Ctype.subtype_rec checks unit with variant_has_same_runtime_representation_as_target, which takes a constructor without @as to be its name as a string, and so accepts string. Variant_coercion.type_is_variant, which guards the coercion from a polymorphic variant to a variant, leaves out neither type, and can_coerce_polyvariant_to_variant then matches #"true" to the constructor true by name. Variant_type_spread.map_constructors in compiler/ml/variant_type_spread.ml copies the constructors of bool and unit like those of any variant; Translcore.transl_exp builds true and false by name as booleans, and on master Lambda.const_constructor builds () as undefined, while the spread variant matches and coerces them as untagged constructors, which are strings.
Reproduced with 12.0.0-alpha.6, 12.3.1, 13.0.0-alpha.6 and master (c10223e80). 11.1.4 and 12.0.0-alpha.1 also accept (() :> string) and the spreads, but reject the polymorphic variant coercions, which became possible with #6981. The suggested coercion and the @as and @unboxed reasons appear in 12.3.1, 13.0.0-alpha.6 and master, not in 12.0.0-alpha.6.
Related: #6311, #6316, #6980, #6981, #7505.
- 主要语言
- OCaml
- 星标
- 7.5k
- 派生
- 484
- 平均合并
- 16 小时 57 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 258
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
rescript-lang/rescript 的其他 Issue
-
Exception analysis does not know the Temporal `fromStringOrThrow` functions可能已有人在做 @cknitt 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
rescript-lang/rescript#9182 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
await in a functor body compiles to invalid JavaScript可能已有人在做 @mununki 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
rescript-lang/rescript#9219 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
A polymorphic variant argument of an external is evaluated twice, or inside a generated function可能已有人在做 @mununki 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 20/100
rescript-lang/rescript#9215 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
rescript-lang/rescript#9212 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
rescript-lang/rescript#9197 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 rescript-lang/rescript 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
-
bug stdlib
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
0.kind: enhancement 9.needs: package (update)
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
S3: friction & debt ws:tooling
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
MedakaLang/medaka#4865 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
subsystem: saw-core type: bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
GaloisInc/saw-script#3516 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复