Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Possible Race Condition

未关闭
#19 2 条评论 2 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
ruby
领域
backend

调研方向

Start with lib/execjs/external_runtime.rb lines 137-144 and the exec_runtime method shown in the issue. Reproduce or trace the reported error, then compare this implementation with the later gem version mentioned in the report. Done means establishing whether the exit-status check is racy and whether upgrading resolves the errors.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

I'm looking at an error thrown in a Rails application which uses v2.0.2 of execjs. I think it may be due to a potential race condition in this method, but I want to

  1. validate my understanding of the error thrown
  2. check, if my understanding is correct and this has been repaired in a later version of the gem, whether a simple upgrade may resolve the errors

For completeness, the method body (which no longer exists in this manner on most recent version) is

def exec_runtime(filename)
  output = sh("#{shell_escape(*(binary.split(' ') << filename))} 2>&1")
  if $?.success?
    output
  else
    raise RuntimeError, output
  end
end

My understanding so far is that, if the most recent exit code is non-zero, the runtime will raise RuntimeError with the shell output even if the shell script executed successfully. The most recent exit code would not have been from the shell script supplying the output -- i.e. a race condition in examining $?

Thank you for your help.

主要语言
Ruby
星标
578
派生
285
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

rails/execjs 的其他 Issue

查看 rails/execjs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Ruby Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。