logging: Logger.setLevel() and logging.disable() are O(number of loggers)

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#160,936 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
38/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python
领域
backend, performance

调研方向

Start with Manager._clear_cache() and Logger.isEnabledFor() in CPython’s logging implementation, then inspect the logging tests that cover cache invalidation. The issue includes a benchmark reproducing quadratic behavior across thousands of loggers. Done means cache clearing scales with loggers that have cached values while preserving correct isEnabledFor() results after level changes.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

performance stdlib type-bug
Bug report

Every Logger.setLevel() and logging.disable() call goes through Manager._clear_cache(), which walks the whole loggerDict and clears each logger's isEnabledFor cache, even the ones that never cached anything. So setting the level on N loggers one by one is quadratic. That shows up in apps or test suites with thousands of loggers (one per module/plugin/connection) that get configured individually.

import logging, time

for n in (1000, 2000, 4000, 8000):
    logging.root.manager.loggerDict.clear()
    loggers = [logging.getLogger(f"app.mod{i}") for i in range(n)]
    for lg in loggers:
        lg.isEnabledFor(logging.DEBUG)
    t = time.perf_counter()
    for lg in loggers:
        lg.setLevel(logging.INFO)
    print(f"{n:5d} loggers: {time.perf_counter() - t:.3f} s")

On 3.14.7 this gives about 0.23 s at 2000 loggers, 0.89 s at 4000 and 4.4 s at 8000 (each doubling is about 4x).

A fix is to have the manager remember which loggers actually have something in their cache (a WeakSet filled on the isEnabledFor cache-miss path, which already holds the lock) and only clear those. The cache-hit path doesn't change. I have a patch ready and can open a PR.

CPython versions tested on:

3.14, CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Linked PRs
  • gh-160937
主要语言
Python
星标
77.8k
派生
37.7k
平均合并
17 小时 24 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
716

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python/cpython 的其他 Issue

查看 python/cpython 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。