Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

save() increments SEQUENCE by default - wrong for sync and copy use cases

已关闭
#739 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python
领域
api

调研方向

Start at CalendarObjectResource.save(), where increase_seqno defaults to True, then check the other save paths the issue names (add_event(), save_object()) for whether they forward the flag. The issue leaves the choice open: flip the default with a deprecation period, or keep it and document it. Get a maintainer decision before coding. Done means the chosen behaviour is applied consistently across the save paths and covered by tests.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Disclaimer: AI-generated text below the line, generated by Claude Opus 5.5 (Claude Code), from the prompt:

https://github.com/pycalendar/calendaring-sync/pull/19 [and the design notes of the calendaring library] - please file the issues mentioned in that pull request


CalendarObjectResource.save() has increase_seqno=True as default, so every save of an object that has a SEQUENCE property bumps it.

RFC 5545 §3.8.7.4 has the organizer increment SEQUENCE for significant revisions, and RFC 5546 uses it to order scheduling messages. A sync engine or a copy/migrate tool that writes an object it read elsewhere is not making a revision: it must store the data unchanged, or the two sides diverge and every sync round bumps the number again. Cosmetic edits (fixing a typo in a description) arguably don't warrant a bump either.

Callers can pass increase_seqno=False, but the default surprises anyone who expects save() to save what they have.

Options:

  • flip the default to False (breaking, would need a deprecation period), or
  • keep it, but document it prominently and make sure every save path (add_event(), save_object(), …) passes the flag through.

Found by calendaring-sync, which must disable it in its adapter: https://github.com/pycalendar/calendaring-sync/pull/19
Related discussion on implicit changes to objects: https://github.com/python-caldav/caldav/issues/613

主要语言
Python
星标
412
派生
113
平均合并
22 小时 43 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
43

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

python-caldav/caldav 的其他 Issue

查看 python-caldav/caldav 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。