Add standard "known vulnerabilities" metadata field, sourced from OSV
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Start with PythonRepositoryVersionViewSet and the existing VulnerabilityReport.vulns data, then compare the response-shape precedent in #1282 for PackageYank. The work is done when Simple API and JSON API responses expose the standard vulnerabilities field from OSV results, with the issue's open question about automatic scanning resolved.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
pulp_python already has vulnerability-scanning capability: a scan action on PythonRepositoryVersionViewSet (added in #1013/#1012) queries OSV.dev and stores results in pulpcore's VulnerabilityReport model. However, that data is not exposed through the standard PyPI "known vulnerabilities" metadata field described in the PyPI JSON API spec — the existing scan output lives in its own report resource, not in the Simple API / JSON API response shape that standard PyPI tooling expects, and today's scan is manual/on-demand only. Tooling that relies on the standard field for vulnerability visibility (e.g. Red Hat Trusted Libraries / the pulp-trustify effort) has no way to consume it from pulp_python today.
Describe the solution you'd like
Surface the existing VulnerabilityReport.vulns data (see above) through the Simple API / JSON API responses as the standard vulnerabilities field, following a comparable per-(name, version) marker pattern to native PackageYank support (#1282) for the API-shape/serializer side. OSV remains the data source underneath — no new scanning backend needed. Open design question to resolve here: scanning today is manual/on-demand only — deciding whether it should also trigger automatically (e.g. on sync/upload) is in scope for this issue.
This is agreed phase-1 scope for the Pulp-Trustify integration effort — complex/custom scanning and Trustify-specific data-source integration are intentionally deferred to a later phase (see context below).
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Implementing this in
pulp-serviceinstead — ruled out;pulp-service(the hosted Pulp team) is an external stakeholder for this effort, not a place for this logic to live. - Full Trustify-backed scanning/library integration now — deferred; this issue is scoped narrowly to the standard OSV-sourced
vulnerabilitiesfield, decoupled from the broaderpulp-trustifycore-library work happening in parallel in pulp/pulp_trustify. - Building a new scanning mechanism from scratch — ruled out; #1013/#1012 already added an OSV.dev-backed scan pipeline (
VulnerabilityReportmodel,scanaction) that this issue should extend rather than duplicate.
Additional context
- Part of the broader Trustify integration program (Red Hat Trusted Libraries / Calunga); tracked upstream at pulp/pulp_trustify.
- Related PRs: #1013/#1012 (existing OSV.dev-backed scan pipeline —
VulnerabilityReportmodel,scanaction — the mechanism this issue extends), #1282 (nativePackageYankcontent model — API-shape precedent for surfacing a per-package marker). - Filed on behalf of Otávio Fernandes; Gerrod Ubben to be notified separately once this is actually filed — he may pick it up next sprint, or review a contribution from Otávio.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 49
- 派生
- 88
- 平均合并
- 1 天 10 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 31
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
pulp/pulp_python 的其他 Issue
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
pulp/pulp_python#1381 ·
-
Feature Triage-Needed
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 45/100
pulp/pulp_python#1371 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 52/100
pulp/pulp_python#1358 ·
-
Feature
pulp/pulp_python#1340 · 已指派 1 人 ·
-
Issue
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
pulp/pulp_python#1219 · 1 条评论 ·
相似的 Issue
-
documentation help wanted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 90/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 90/100
simonw/sqlite-utils#872 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100