Subagent workflows

未关闭
#398 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 2 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
ai-infra-agents, python

调研方向

Start by reading the linked shinychat issue posit-dev/shinychat#423 to understand the tool-call surfacing limitation, then trace how commons wires its agent into the shinychat chat UI (the agent/chat entry point) and how tool-call UIs are currently rendered. The trustedminiagents.dev page on bypassing the AI model shows the intended trust pattern. Done looks like either a commons-side workaround for surfacing subagent tool calls in the shared history, or a documented design for hierarchical subagent teams.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

I think commons could benefit from the ability to run a hierarchical subagent team under the same chat UI and conversation history. Most serious agents seem to be multi-agent workflows these days, and multi-agent commons workflows could partition a large set of measures into small domain-oriented context windows.

The tricky part is that commons needs visible tool call UIs that bypass the LLM and earn trust, but shinychat has no way of automatically surfacing tool calls from subagents. I posted https://github.com/posit-dev/shinychat/issues/423 to draw attention to this limitation, both for commons and other shinychat-powered agents. Hopefully a workaround or solution in shinychat is possible.

主要语言
Python
星标
69
派生
5
平均合并
4 天 21 小时
30 天内合并 PR
40

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

posit-dev/commons 的其他 Issue

查看 posit-dev/commons 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。