Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

TLS memory overflow - V8 garbage collection

未关闭
#65,263 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
javascript, nodejs

调研方向

使用 npm run server 和 issue 中描述的加密 WebSocket Performance Test 设置,在 aphorio repository 中重现。观察 V8 垃圾回收和堆错误输出,同时比较 TLS 运行与未加密运行。加密测试完成并返回结果,且未耗尽内存,即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

tls
Version

26.7.0

Platform
Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
Subsystem

No response

What steps will reproduce the bug?
  1. git clone https://github.com/prettydiff/aphorio
  2. npm run server
  3. Open a web browser to localhost and the specified port number
  4. In the browser use the left side navigation and choose Performance Test
  5. Choose these experiment settings:
    • WebSocket
    • Encrypted
    • Send Only
    • Force GC Between Tests
    • Location - 127.0.0.1
    • Port - specified secure port
    • Test Quantity - 5000000
    • Number of tests - 10
    • Message Body - "test"
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

50%, no required condition

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

The expected behavior is the application remains executing and returns test results.

What do you see instead?
<--- Last few GCs --->

[16960:00000220C3725000]   178739 ms: Scavenge (during sweeping) 7914.8 (7952.1) -> 7887.9 (7954.4) MB, pooled: 0.0 MB, 3.29 / 0.00 ms (average mu = 0.348, current mu = 0.370) allocation failure;
[16960:00000220C3725000]   179468 ms: Incremental Mark-Compact (reduce) 7919.9 (7957.1) -> 7890.5 (7896.4) MB, pooled: 0.0 MB, 33.63 / 0.00 ms (+ 668.4 ms in 133 steps since start of marking, biggest step 5.2 ms, walltime since start of marking 720 ms) (a
FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
----- Native stack trace -----

 1: 00007FF748A7641D node::OnFatalError+1325
 2: 00007FF749840FB1 v8::Function::NewInstance+577
 3: 00007FF749625287 SSL_CTX_set_stateless_cookie_verify_cb+504087
 4: 00007FF749622E4D SSL_CTX_set_stateless_cookie_verify_cb+494813
 5: 00007FF74961D511 SSL_CTX_set_stateless_cookie_verify_cb+471969
 6: 00007FF749624DEA SSL_CTX_set_stateless_cookie_verify_cb+502906
 7: 00007FF7493C8C8F v8::MemorySpan<v8::internal::DirectHandle<v8::internal::Map> >::operator[]+890943
 8: 00007FF749665ADE v8::internal::StrongRootAllocatorBase::deallocate_impl+201886
 9: 00007FF74986B73C v8::ArrayBuffer::New+172
10: 00007FF748AD2A7F node::Buffer::New+43359
11: 00000220EBD501DA
Additional information

Unencrypted tests never fail in this manner as they will run to completion as long as it takes. This problem is specific to TLS. I have been able to run experiments comprising greater than 50,000,000 WebSocket messages repeatedly without any failures.

The error messaging indicates garbage collection in V8 is the culprit, but I suspect the problem could be OpenSSL causing V8 to hang unexpectedly until all memory is consumed.

This is an aside, but it seems at maximum efficiency I can send 3,250,000 messages in 0.002 seconds but the next 0.998 seconds is spent on garbage collection. I don't know if this is a potentially untapped optimization target. Aside from the garbage collection time it seems executing WebSockets like this application does is about 2300x faster than Bun.
I had a defect in my profiler.

主要语言
JavaScript
星标
122k
派生
37.4k
平均合并
4 天 4 小时
30 天内合并 PR
276

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

nodejs/node 的其他 Issue

查看 nodejs/node 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。