S14.1: Compare strategies side by side

未关闭
#174 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

Read the roadmap entry for S14.1 and its dependency, S13.3 (#172), then inspect the committed project structure for existing run APIs and web pages. The issue calls for an API and page comparing two to four runs, including a metrics table, overlaid equity curves, a spec diff, and monthly-return statistics. Done means all acceptance criteria are implemented; no file paths or tests are named in the issue.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

area: web priority: P0 story

Roadmap story S14.1 · Project · Roadmap

Parent epic: E14 #106

Dependencies: S13.3 #172

Priority: P0 · Size: M · Sprint: 12 · Milestone: M9 · Area: web · Depends on: S13.3 · Reqs: FR-R1 · Status: Backlog

Story: As a researcher, I want to compare strategies directly, so that I can see which idea is actually better.

Acceptance criteria

  • Select two to four runs to see a metrics table, overlaid equity curves, and a spec diff.
  • The difference in monthly returns is shown with its mean, t-statistic, and correlation.

Tasks

  • Write the comparison API
  • Build the comparison page

Progress evidence (2026-11-08): No implementation or completion evidence for these acceptance criteria is present in the audited commit. This remains planned work.

Audited against committed main at 0c32c57. Local, staged, and untracked work is excluded.

主要语言
Python
星标
0
派生
0
平均合并
3 小时 33 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
50

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

nfiasco/Quant-Time-Machine 的其他 Issue

查看 nfiasco/Quant-Time-Machine 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。