Privacy tiers per project (local-only / approved-providers-only) with a Ledger attestation

未关闭
#176 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
typescript

调研方向

Start by reading the related issues #117, #145, and #118, then locate the scheduler and Ledger attestation export in the repository. Trace how project provider restrictions reach scheduling and how exported attestations are checked against the hash chain. Done means a local-only project cannot be assigned to a cloud agent and the attestation verifies that no turn used an unapproved provider.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

area:providers area:security needs-triage p2 type:feature

Part of #117 · Part of #145 · beat-Paperclip spec id E26

  • Priority: p2
  • Labels: type:feature, area:security, area:providers
  • Relates to: #145, #117 (#118)
  • Scope: Tag a project with an allowed provider set. The scheduler refuses to run disallowed providers. The Ledger can export an attestation that no turn used a provider outside the set.
  • Acceptance:
    • A local-only project cannot be assigned to a cloud agent; this is enforced at scheduling, not just in the UI.
    • The attestation export verifies against the hash chain.

Source: Paperclip issue/discussion research (docs, GitHub issues, live instance).

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
3
派生
0
平均合并
17 小时 33 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
163

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

musterhq/muster-code 的其他 Issue

查看 musterhq/muster-code 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。