StdioClientTransport should support bounded child process termination

未关闭
#937 4 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
java
领域
backend

调研方向

从 StdioClientTransport.closeGracefully() 开始,检查 ServerParameters 如何配置 transport,以及如何等待 process.onExit()。添加可配置的 termination timeout,然后使用忽略 SIGTERM 的 child process 运行或添加建议的 regression test。完成的标准是 shutdown 在 timeout buffer 内完成,强制终止仍存活的 child,并清理 schedulers 和 sinks。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement P2 ready for work

StdioClientTransport starts and manages a child MCP server process. During graceful shutdown, the SDK transport currently calls process.destroy() and waits for process.onExit().

That works when the child process responds to SIGTERM, but it can hang indefinitely if the child process ignores termination or becomes stuck. Downstream, we had to implement a custom McpClientTransport to ensure proxied MCP server processes are always cleaned up when the parent shuts down.

Current behavior

The current shutdown flow is effectively:

if (this.process != null) {
  this.process.destroy();
  return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit());
}

There is no configurable timeout and no fallback to destroyForcibly().

Expected behavior

StdioClientTransport.closeGracefully() should support bounded process termination:

  1. Stop accepting new messages.
  2. Complete the transport sinks.
  3. Send graceful termination with process.destroy().
  4. Wait up to a configurable timeout.
  5. If the process is still alive, call process.destroyForcibly().
  6. Dispose the transport schedulers.

This guarantees that child MCP server processes do not survive parent shutdown indefinitely.

Proposed fix

Add a configurable process termination timeout to StdioClientTransport, with a sensible default.

Conceptually:

process.destroy();

return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit())
  .timeout(processTerminationTimeout, Mono.defer(() -> {
    if (process.isAlive()) {
      process.destroyForcibly();
    }
    return Mono.fromFuture(process.onExit());
  }));

This could be exposed through the existing ServerParameters builder or a dedicated StdioClientTransport constructor/builder option.

Suggested regression test

Add a test with a child process that ignores SIGTERM or does not exit promptly.

The test should verify that:

  1. closeGracefully() completes within the configured timeout plus a small buffer.
  2. The child process is no longer alive after closeGracefully() completes.
  3. The transport schedulers and sinks are cleaned up.
主要语言
Java
星标
3.7k
派生
1.1k
平均合并
1 天 15 小时
30 天内合并 PR
9

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk 的其他 Issue

查看 modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。