Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[rush] rush-daemon-transport: long socket paths are silently truncated so workspaces share one daemon; reclaim lock steal is not exclusive; deleting the runtime dir leaves an unreachable daemon running

未关闭
#6,083 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
linux, nodejs, typescript
领域
cli, devtools, tooling

调研方向

The issue points to specific files: libraries/rush-daemon-transport/src/DaemonPaths.ts for socket path length, DaemonReclaimLock.ts for mutex handling, and DaemonReclaim.ts for lock cleanup. Start by reproducing the truncation with a long XDG_RUNTIME_DIR, then examine the socket creation and reclaim lock logic. Testing involves concurrent processes and file system operations. 'Done' means each of the three problems is fixed with robust error handling and atomic operations.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Summary

Three robustness problems in the daemon transport, each reproduced on Linux with rush-client/rushd from main @ 60007c9a8c:

  1. Socket paths longer than sun_path (108 bytes) are silently truncated, so different workspaces share one daemon. resolveDaemonPaths (libraries/rush-daemon-transport/src/DaemonPaths.ts:61-67) builds <base>/rushd-<uid>/rushd-<32hex>.sock (the base plus 55 bytes) and never checks the result against the limit. Node/libuv then truncate the path on listen()/connect(). The part that gets cut off is the workspace key: with a 77-character base the socket is named rushd-44c88aeea54e6, and with 90 characters it is just rushd-. So with a long XDG_RUNTIME_DIR or TMPDIR (deep CI, sandbox, Nix or Bazel-style directories), workspace B talks to workspace A's daemon: daemon status in ws2 reports ws1's PID, build fails with Cannot attest the restarting daemon ownership, and daemon stop in ws1 can stop the wrong daemon. Expected: detect overlong paths and switch to a shorter derived location (for example a hashed path under a short base), or fail with a clear error. Never truncate silently.
  2. The reclaim mutex's steal path is not exclusive. On EEXIST with a dead mutexPid, tryAcquireReclaimLock (DaemonReclaimLock.ts:73-86) calls rewriteMutexEntry (:47-64), which does unlinkSync(lock) and then writeFileSync(lock, { flag: 'wx' }). Two stealers can both see "dead holder"; B then unlinks A's fresh file and creates its own, so both acquire. In 10 trials with 16 concurrent stealers, every trial had more than one holder (2-6). In addition, readMutexPid treats a just-created, still-empty file as dead, and the finally in DaemonReclaim.ts:46-52 unlinks .reclaim even when another process owns it. Expected: steal atomically (for example rename a uniquely named file over the lock and re-verify ownership after writing), and release only a lock you still own.
  3. Deleting the runtime dir or socket leaves an unreachable live daemon running alongside a new one. systemd-logind removes /run/user/<uid> at logout, and tmp cleaners can remove it too. The old daemon keeps running, unreachable, until its idle timeout (900 s by default); the next client auto-starts a second daemon for the same workspace; and daemon stop only reaches the new one. Expected: after binding, the host periodically re-validates that lstat(socketPath) still matches the bound inode and that the lockfile still names its own PID, and shuts down (or re-publishes its endpoint) when it doesn't.

Repro steps

  1. Start the daemon with XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<90-char dir> in two different workspaces, then run daemon status in the second: it reports the first workspace's PID.
  2. Seed <key>.pid.json.reclaim with {"mutexPid": <dead pid>} and have 16 forked processes call tryAcquireReclaimLock at the same moment: more than one acquires.
  3. rush-client daemon start && rush-client build, then rm -rf $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/rushd-<uid>, then rush-client build: two daemon processes now exist for the workspace.

Expected result: As described for each item above.

Actual result: As described for each item above.

Details

This was found during an automated performance/behavior analysis of rush-client/rushd on Linux. Each item was confirmed independently (item 1 twice).

Standard questions

Question Answer
@microsoft/rush globally installed version? built from main @ 60007c9a8c (5.179.0)
rushVersion from rush.json? 5.179.0
pnpmVersion, npmVersion, or yarnVersion from rush.json? pnpm@10.27.0
(if pnpm) useWorkspaces from pnpm-config.json? true
Operating system? Linux (WSL2 Ubuntu 24.04)
Would you consider contributing a PR? Yes
Node.js version (node -v)? 22.23.2
主要语言
TypeScript
星标
6.5k
派生
708
平均合并
4 天 13 小时
30 天内合并 PR
62

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

microsoft/rushstack 的其他 Issue

查看 microsoft/rushstack 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。