Associate companion files with `ProjectService` without Content Mappers

未关闭
#64,610 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
angular, go, typescript

调研方向

Start by tracing ProjectService handling for getDefaultProjectForFile, extraFileExtensions, and Content Mappers. Compare how include globs and companion files are associated with projects, then define how a lightweight registration could avoid content transformation and virtual .ts AST generation. Done means an external HTML template can discover its project on cold start without the fake open workaround.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Suggestion
🔍 Search Terms

extraFileExtensions
ScriptKind.Unknown
getDefaultProjectForFile
companion files
cold start project
openProjects

✅ Viability Checklist
⭐ Suggestion

Something like content mappers for registering extra extensions as included in the project but without the requirement of actually doing content mapping

📃 Motivating Example

We're currently prototyping the new Angular Language Service against TS-Go (tsgo --lsp with the API session pipe). In our setup, our extension manages a separate language server to handle Angular-specific template features, and uses TS-Go as the backend semantic and type-checking engine.

Because we manage our own compiler instance per tsconfig.json, we need to know which project owns a file when it's opened. We're running into a cold-start discovery problem when a user opens an external template first (e.g. app.component.html): getDefaultProjectForFile returns nothing because TS doesn't recognize .html as belonging to any configured project. Since Angular hasn't compiled yet, we don't know the TS ↔ HTML association either, so we don't know which tsconfig to load.

To work around this today, we do a "fake open dance" where we guess a sibling app.component.ts file, send a synthetic didOpen to TS-Go just to spin up the project and discover the tsconfig path, and then boot our compiler.

Content Mappers don't really fit here because they require transforming foreign files into virtual .ts ASTs and generating .ts output. For Angular, HTML files are external companion templates—our template type-checking code is generated out-of-band in separate .ngtypecheck.ts files. Forcing a Content Mapper onto .html files just introduces unwanted .ts AST generation and emit overhead.

Previously, extraFileExtensions with ScriptKind.Unknown kept projects active when matched by include globs. Since non-TS extensions in include globs are more standard now with content mappers, we're fine requiring .html in include. A lightweight extension registration (or a no-transform companion mode that lets include globs associate .html with ProjectService without generating virtual .ts ASTs) would eliminate the cold-start issue and the fake open workaround.

💻 Use Cases
  1. What do you want to use this for?
    Angular language service

  2. What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
    Mentioned above

  3. What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
    attempting to open a ts file with the same name

主要语言
Go
星标
112k
派生
15.4k
平均合并
3 天 1 小时
30 天内合并 PR
136

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

microsoft/TypeScript 的其他 Issue

查看 microsoft/TypeScript 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。