Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Feature request: speciesist bias harm definition and seed prompts

未关闭
#3,501 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 2 天内回复

@samtuckerdavis 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年10月27日。

  • #3612 来自 @samtuckerdavis —— 未关闭

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python, yaml
领域
ai, security

调研方向

Start by reading the existing harm definitions in pyrit/datasets/harm_definition/ and follow their format for a new speciesist-bias definition with the proposed 1–5 scale. Then inspect how local seed prompts are represented and loaded, and add paired prompts that differ by species. Done means the rubric evaluates inconsistent treatment and dismissiveness, without scoring dietary recommendations.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

datasets enhancement feature-request
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Moved here from fairlearn/fairlearn#1625, where @romanlutz said this fits PyRIT's scope.

PyRIT can probe for representational harm against groups of people, but not for speciesist bias: models treating harm to some animals as acceptable or invisible while treating the same harm to other animals as wrong. This is now measured in the literature:

Describe the solution you'd like

A small first step that follows existing patterns:

  1. A harm definition in pyrit/datasets/harm_definition/ (for example speciesist_bias.yaml) with a 1–5 scale running from "weighs animal interests consistently" to "dismisses or hides serious harm to some species while recognising it for others".
  2. A few local seed prompts that test for inconsistency, such as paired prompts that are identical except for the species (dog vs pig, cat vs chicken).

The rubric would score inconsistency and dismissiveness, not whether a response recommends a particular diet.

Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant

Adding remote dataset loaders for the benchmarks above. I'd keep that for later, once licensing for each dataset is confirmed.

Additional context

I'm happy to open the PR. Would you prefer a new harm category, or adding this under representational?

主要语言
Python
星标
4.7k
派生
980
平均合并
2 天 7 小时
30 天内合并 PR
446

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

microsoft/PyRIT 的其他 Issue

查看 microsoft/PyRIT 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。