Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

feat: a skill that finds where the session's skills didn't fit and files the gaps

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#6,417 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
22/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
shell
领域
ai, developer-experience, tooling

调研方向

This is a new skill (suggested names /plugin-quality:fit-gaps or /session-flow:skill-fit) that must read on-disk session transcripts and subagent returns, attribute gaps to owning plugins, de-duplicate with gh issue list --search, and only file issues after owner confirmation. Start from the existing skills named in the issue (/discipline:use-your-skills, /plugin-quality:audit, /session-flow:retro) and from session dba79e68-af19-4ecc-a0ce-69d8b1dbefbb plus issues #6412 and #6413 as the intended output. Done means the skill presents a ledger and files evidence-first issues only on yes; this is product design, not a one-file edit.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

needs-human needs-triage

Problem

When a skill doesn't fit the work in front of it, the session quietly works around it. That workaround is the most useful feedback a plugin can get, and today it is lost unless someone notices and files it by hand.

In the 2026-10-04 CI-performance session the owner asked for that by hand twice. Each time the coordinator reconstructed the gaps from memory and filed #6412 and #6413. The gaps it found:

  • implement-dispatch needs a PLAN.md, but the work came as scoped audit output, so workers were hand-dispatched with re-typed lifecycle rules;
  • workers stalled five times waiting on their own background work;
  • a research skill's verifier failed twice on labeling for vendor-documented facts, so the loop was stopped by judgment;
  • workers' classifier denials could not see the owner's approval, so edits were escalated to the main session.

Existing skills cover parts but not this:

  • /discipline:use-your-skills finds a skill that should have fired, not one that fired and didn't fit.
  • /plugin-quality:audit audits one named component after use, not a whole session's fit.
  • /session-flow:retro codifies session learnings, not per-skill gaps routed to their owners.

Ask

A skill the owner can fire at any point (start, middle or end), for example /plugin-quality:fit-gaps or /session-flow:skill-fit. It would:

  1. Read the session's on-disk transcript and its subagents' returns. Find each place where:
    • a skill was invoked and then bypassed or overridden;
    • a coordinator re-typed the same rules into several briefs;
    • a worker stalled, or was nudged or re-briefed for the same reason more than once;
    • a permission or classifier denial forced a workaround;
    • a verifier loop was stopped by judgment;
    • the owner asked "is there a skill for this".
      At session start, with no transcript yet, it instead lists the skills that likely apply to the stated task and their known fit limits, from open issues.
  2. Attribute each gap to its owning plugin or skill, citing transcript evidence.
  3. De-duplicate against that plugin's open issues (gh issue list --search).
  4. Present a ledger of gap, owning skill, evidence, proposed change and existing issue. File the new ones only on the owner's yes, with evidence-first bodies. That fits the org's rule that no automated process opens issues.
  5. Optionally propose a new-skill candidate when no existing skill owns a recurring pattern.

Evidence

Session dba79e68-af19-4ecc-a0ce-69d8b1dbefbb, plus #6412 and #6413, which this skill would have produced.

主要语言
Shell
星标
22
派生
2
平均合并
5 小时 15 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
833

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

melodic-software/claude-code-plugins 的其他 Issue

查看 melodic-software/claude-code-plugins 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Shell/Bash Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。