Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Expose configurable outgoing audio chunk duration for Deepgram Flux

已关闭 适合新手
#7,204 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
74/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

从 livekit-plugins-deepgram 包开始:找到 deepgram.STTv2 的构造函数,以及 SpeechStreamv2._run 循环中将 samples_per_channel 设置为 sample_rate // 20(50 ms 默认值)的位置。传入一个可选的正整数参数 chunk_size_ms,使得只有该批处理算术发生变化,同时保持默认值和部分分块的 flush 不变。添加一个 fake WebSocket 测试,断言 50 ms 和 80 ms 时发出的消息大小;完成的标准是默认行为不变且新选项产生 80 ms 的批次。注意该 issue 在询问维护者 API 是否合适,所以在投入大量精力之前请先确认是否被接受。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Proposal

Expose an optional chunk_size_ms argument on deepgram.STTv2 so applications can configure outgoing PCM WebSocket batching. Keep the existing 50 ms default; allow opting into 80 ms without replacing the plugin's send loop.

In the tested Deepgram plugin version (1.6.1), SpeechStreamv2._run sets samples_per_channel to sample_rate // 20. Deepgram's Flux quickstart recommends 80 ms chunks (2,560 bytes for mono linear16 at 16 kHz).

Updated evidence: isolated Flux benchmark

We repeated the comparison with 24 direct WebSocket trials from a LiveKit Cloud worker in us-east, removing RTC media, VAD, LiveKit endpointing, LLM, and TTS from the measured path. This follow-up tests the effect of PCM batching on observed Flux EOT latency.

The primary metric is the interval from acoustic speech end on a real-time-paced PCM timeline to receipt of Flux EndOfTurn by the worker. Acoustic speech end is the end of the last 10 ms window with normalized RMS above 0.025. Both timestamps use the same worker-side monotonic clock.

Synthetic utterance Mean EOT latency, 50 ms chunks Mean EOT latency, 80 ms chunks Difference, 80 minus 50
“Please tell me where to put the blue notebook.” 437.5 ms 400.7 ms −36.8 ms
“Please put the blue notebook.” 446.2 ms 418.8 ms −27.5 ms
“on the wooden table next to the lamp.” 532.4 ms 523.5 ms −8.9 ms
All trials 472.0 ms 447.7 ms −24.4 ms (about 5.2%)

We used three distinct prerecorded utterances. Each utterance was sent to Flux eight times: four times using 50 ms audio chunks and four times using 80 ms audio chunks.

A trial means sending one complete utterance over a fresh WebSocket connection and measuring the time from its acoustic speech end to receipt of Flux’s EndOfTurn event. The 50 ms and 80 ms values describe the duration of audio in each WebSocket message—not the duration of the utterance or the interval between trials.

For a given utterance, every trial used identical PCM audio, including the same leading and trailing silence. Only the outgoing chunk size changed.

We organized the trials into two blocks:

Block First trial Second trial Third trial Fourth trial
Block 1 50 ms 80 ms 80 ms 50 ms
Block 2 80 ms 50 ms 50 ms 80 ms

We used this counterbalanced order to reduce the influence of changes over time, such as network conditions or provider load. Running all 50 ms trials first and all 80 ms trials afterward could favor whichever condition happened to run during a faster period. Reversing the order in the second block gives both chunk sizes exposure to earlier and later positions.

This reduces ordering bias

80 ms was faster in 8 of 12 adjacent matched pairs; the median paired difference was −23.5 ms. All 24 trials produced exactly one EndOfTurn, none before the acoustic boundary. Final transcripts matched across conditions for each utterance, and all EOT events had trigger: model.

Suggested scope

A constructor-only positive integer duration, documented in milliseconds, used solely by the local audio batching loop. Preserve the 50 ms default and existing partial-chunk flush behavior.

Would this API fit the plugin? A small draft implementation with fake-WebSocket tests can serve as a concrete proposal.

主要语言
Python
星标
14.6k
派生
3.9k
平均合并
2 天 23 小时
30 天内合并 PR
177

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

livekit/agents 的其他 Issue

查看 livekit/agents 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。