Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Should we allow creation of participants with uuids provided by the client?

未关闭
#130 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
elixir
领域
api, backend

调研方向

首先阅读 issue #128,以及在创建委托和投票期间当前的 participant upsert 行为。明确是否应接受客户端提供的 participant UUID,然后记录有关标识符安全性、仅查看 UUID 和临时标识符的决策。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

This has come up during investigation of #128, and needs further discussion:

One of the reasons we decided to use uuids as ids is to enable passing around of identifiers to/from clients and other services, and we're supporting for pre-existing resources in our system - votes, delegations and participants already persisted in the database.

Currently we support upserts of participants on delegation and voting creation based on emails provided by the client.

Another potential scenario is when the client already generates uuids for their participants (for which they're the source the truth), and submits that to us instead of an email. For instance, when creating a delegation, submitting delegator_id and delegate_id instead of a delegator_email and delegate_email. This could be a way to improve the privacy of the participant in our system. We'd only know their client-side id.

Questions raised so far:

  • YAGNI?
  • any security issues with passing around a direct db identifier like that?
  • in some instances clients will create a view-only uuid, and sometimes that's ephemeral. How do we handle that?
主要语言
Elixir
星标
17
派生
3
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

liquidvotingio/api 的其他 Issue

查看 liquidvotingio/api 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Elixir Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。