Docs: reconcile the tracing page with the generated telemetry contract
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 65/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- go, python, typescript
调研方向
Start by reading docs/architecture/telemetry.md and docs/architecture/telemetry-contract.md in the kagent repository. Run an agent to capture a live trace, comparing emitted attributes and span names against the tables in docs/observability/tracing.md. Verify the capture control environment variables by testing each. Update the correlation table to distinguish contract attributes from transitional Go ADK keys, and ensure audit-prompts.md receives the same updates. Done when all claims are validated against a live trace and both pages are reconciled.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
The correlation attributes table on observability/tracing.md is wrong for kagent, the default runtime.
Targets v1.0.0-alpha7, verified 2026-10-06. Sequence after #531, which rewrites the same pages for the Helm value rename. The Agent and Session pass landed in #551.
| Attribute the page lists | What alpha7 emits |
|---|---|
gen_ai.conversation.id |
Correct on every runtime. |
gen_ai.task.id |
Python runtimes only. The Go ADK emits a2a.task.id. |
kagent.user_id |
Python runtimes only. The Go ADK emits enduser.id. |
kagent.app_name |
Nothing emits it. At alpha7 the name survives only in go/core/test/e2e/tracing_test.go. |
A reader who builds a dashboard from this table keys it on one attribute no runtime writes, and two more that are absent on the runtime they are most likely using.
The table has to split by runtime
The split is durable, not a brief overlap: the Go ADK's only remaining keys outside the contract are gcp.vertex.agent.*, while the Python ADK, LangGraph and CrewAI still carry kagent.user_id and gen_ai.task.id. Moving Python off OpenLLMetry remains open on kagent#2907. docs/architecture/telemetry.md records the split in its Who emits what table.
The contract's request identity is gen_ai.conversation.id, a2a.task.id and enduser.id, with kagent.runtime on the resource and kagent.invocation.segment on request spans. kagent.runtime is absent on every Python runtime, so those traces cannot be filtered by runtime at all.
Also worth covering, since neither is discoverable from a span name: kagent.invocation.segment distinguishes initial from resumed, and turns are counted by it rather than by invoke_agent spans; kagent.invocation.relationship is a link attribute that states a relationship without reparenting spans or moving token usage.
Spans and captured content
The span table names invocation, which kagent#2929 removed. At alpha7 the request span is an otelgrpc or otelhttp SERVER span, with kagent's a2a.request on the Go ADK and a FastAPI SERVER span on the Python runtimes. The contract names span definitions rather than emitted names, so kagent.invoke_agent.internal is emitted as invoke_agent {gen_ai.agent.name}.
The capture warning names gcp.vertex.agent.llm_request and llm_response, which are Go ADK keys outside the contract. The contract records content as gen_ai.input.messages and gen_ai.output.messages, with kagent.capture.*_truncated reporting truncation. The capture variable question is settled and belongs to #531; do not reopen it here.
Before starting
This needs a live trace. Everything above is read from generated documentation and source, and telemetry.md states that nothing yet compares emitted telemetry against the registry. Run the tracing guide on the kagent runtime and on one Python runtime, since the point is that they differ, and confirm kagent.app_name is genuinely absent rather than emitted from a path the source search missed.
Done when
- The correlation table splits by runtime, and a reader can tell which attributes their runtime emits without capturing a trace to find out.
-
kagent.app_nameis gone, or is shown with evidence that something emits it. -
a2a.task.id,enduser.id,kagent.invocation.segmentandkagent.runtimeare covered, includingkagent.runtimebeing absent on Python. - The span table matches alpha7, with
invocationremoved. - The capture warning names the contract attributes and marks
gcp.vertex.agent.*as Go ADK only. - Every claim was checked against a trace captured on the documented version.
-
observability/audit-prompts.mdgot the same pass.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 21
- 派生
- 69
- 平均合并
- 16 小时 25 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 64
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
kagent-dev/website 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
kagent-dev/website#579 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Hold until GA: repoint kagent.dev navigation from 0.x to 1.x可能已有人在做 @Rachael-Graham 于 14 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
kagent-dev/website#521 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
documentation kagent
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 60/100
kagent-dev/website#562 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
help wanted
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 72/100
kagent-dev/website#539 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
help wanted
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
kagent-dev/website#538 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 kagent-dev/website 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4391 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 82/100
Luligu/matterbridge#655 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
software-mansion/argent#1457 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
schmayterling/hibi#245 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ai-driven-qa bug claude Minor
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
linagora/twake-contacts-frontend#241 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复