Cisco NX-OS: Layer3-to-Layer2 gNMI update resets unchanged interface MTU to 1500

未关闭
#709 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
go, kubernetes

调研方向

Start by reading the discussion linked from the issue, then trace how the operator builds and sends gNMI updates for physical interface layer and MTU changes. Look for the relevant reconciliation or update tests and reproduce the Layer3-to-Layer2 case with an unchanged MTU. Done means the requested MTU remains 9216 after the transition and the regression is covered by a test.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

area/switch-automation firmware-bug platform/nx vendor/cisco

Problem Statement

On Cisco NX-OS, changing a physical interface from Layer 3 to Layer 2 through a gNMI Update resets its MTU to 1500, even when the request explicitly keeps the MTU unchanged!

This was reproduced on NX-OS 10.3(9) using an N9Kv. The issue is specific to the Layer3-to-Layer2 transition with the same MTU value. Layer2-to-Layer3 transitions preserve the MTU, and changing the MTU while changing the layer also preserves the requested MTU.

This breaks the operator's interface reconciliation. For example, when a routed member with MTU 9216 joins a Layer 2 port-channel, the operator sends layer: Layer2 and mtu: 9216. NX-OS leaves the member at MTU 1500, causing the port-channel configuration to fail:

Port-channel MTU 9216 doesn't match the interface MTU 1500

Reproduction

Configure the physical interface as Layer 3 with a jumbo MTU:

gnmic -a <device-address> --port <gnmi-port> -u <username> -p <password> \
  --skip-verify --encoding JSON set \
  --update-path 'System/intf-items/phys-items/PhysIf-list[id=eth1/1]' \
  --update-value '{"layer":"Layer3","mtu":9216}'

Change it to Layer 2 while preserving the same MTU:

gnmic -a <device-address> --port <gnmi-port> -u <username> -p <password> \
  --skip-verify --encoding JSON set \
  --update-path 'System/intf-items/phys-items/PhysIf-list[id=eth1/1]' \
  --update-value '{"layer":"Layer2","mtu":9216}'

Read back the configured MTU:

gnmic -a <device-address> --port <gnmi-port> -u <username> -p <password> \
  --skip-verify --encoding JSON get \
  --path 'System/intf-items/phys-items/PhysIf-list[id=eth1/1]/mtu' \
  --type config --values-only

Actual result:

[
  1500
]

Expected Behavior

The configured MTU must remain 9216, because it was included unchanged in the Layer3-to-Layer2 gNMI update payload as part of the request.

Observed Scope

  • Affected: Layer3 → Layer2 with an unchanged MTU (9216 → 9216)
  • Not affected in testing: Layer2 → Layer3 with an unchanged MTU
  • Not affected in testing: Layer3 → Layer2 while changing the MTU (for example, 9000 → 9216)

Impact / Workaround

The operator must issue an additional patch after changing the interface layer to restore the requested MTU. Without it, interfaces intended to join a jumbo Layer 2 port-channel remain at MTU 1500 and cannot be added successfully.

Related Discussion

https://github.com/ironcore-dev/network-operator/pull/667#discussion_r4452687541

主要语言
Go
星标
15
派生
12
平均合并
1 天 11 小时
30 天内合并 PR
81

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

ironcore-dev/network-operator 的其他 Issue

查看 ironcore-dev/network-operator 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。