Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Stats average counters high after upgrade to 3.4.1

未关闭
#3,432 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
c
领域
observability

调研方向

No file pointers are given, so start with a minimal reproducer: a single backend with an average-response-time counter, one burst of slow responses, then quiet traffic, run on 3.2.19 and 3.4.1 side by side. Read how the stats module computes and decays the rtime counter (the 1024-request window) and review what changed in those counters between the two releases. Done means the counter drops back in step with the logged p50/p95 within the same window on 3.4.1, and the differing behaviour is explained.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

status: needs-triage type: bug
Detailed Description of the Problem

After upgrading from 3.2.19 to 3.4.1 I have some stats counters exhibit weird behavior, they look like they remain high for an extended period of time after spiking.

Here is an image of one of the rtime (average response time over 1024 requests) backend server graphs:

Image

At the same time, here is data from the logs - count of requests, 50th, 95th, 99th and max response time for each minute for this backend server.

┌──────────────minute─┬─cnt─┬─p50_srv_response─┬─p95_srv_response─┬─p99_srv_response─┬─max_srv_response─┐
 1. │ 2026-06-29 15:55:00 │ 194 │                1 │              109 │              198 │              488 │
 2. │ 2026-06-29 15:56:00 │ 745 │                1 │              111 │              208 │              526 │
 3. │ 2026-06-29 15:57:00 │ 792 │                1 │               95 │              249 │            10133 │
 4. │ 2026-06-29 15:58:00 │ 771 │                1 │             8491 │            17261 │            19702 │
 5. │ 2026-06-29 15:59:00 │ 658 │                0 │              131 │              323 │             3687 │
 6. │ 2026-06-29 16:00:00 │ 661 │                0 │               91 │              172 │              468 │
 7. │ 2026-06-29 16:01:00 │ 660 │                0 │               89 │              239 │              884 │
 8. │ 2026-06-29 16:02:00 │ 692 │                0 │               94 │              259 │            11892 │
 9. │ 2026-06-29 16:03:00 │ 646 │                0 │               93 │              226 │             1198 │
10. │ 2026-06-29 16:04:00 │ 667 │                0 │              132 │              313 │              647 │
11. │ 2026-06-29 16:05:00 │ 617 │                0 │              109 │              361 │             1178 │
12. │ 2026-06-29 16:06:00 │ 694 │                0 │              113 │              184 │              402 │
13. │ 2026-06-29 16:07:00 │ 734 │                0 │               97 │              195 │              538 │
14. │ 2026-06-29 16:08:00 │ 930 │                1 │               86 │              165 │              496 │
15. │ 2026-06-29 16:09:00 │ 679 │                0 │               87 │              173 │              338 │
16. │ 2026-06-29 16:10:00 │ 754 │                0 │              123 │              195 │              910 │
17. │ 2026-06-29 16:11:00 │ 700 │                0 │              101 │              171 │              624 │
18. │ 2026-06-29 16:12:00 │ 754 │                0 │              130 │              257 │              781 │
19. │ 2026-06-29 16:13:00 │ 726 │                0 │               88 │              247 │             3510 │
20. │ 2026-06-29 16:14:00 │ 779 │                0 │              123 │              208 │              549 │
21. │ 2026-06-29 16:15:00 │ 752 │                0 │              101 │              179 │              499 │
22. │ 2026-06-29 16:16:00 │ 753 │                0 │              125 │              181 │              958 │
23. │ 2026-06-29 16:17:00 │ 725 │                0 │              131 │              410 │              955 │
24. │ 2026-06-29 16:18:00 │ 550 │                0 │               87 │              169 │              259 │
    └─────────────────────┴─────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┘
Expected Behavior

Consistent stats behavior to 3.2 and older and in-line with the logs metrics.

Steps to Reproduce the Behavior

The config I have is huge and would need severe redaction, if nothing is obvious I can work on a minimal reproducer.

Do you have any idea what may have caused this?

No response

Do you have an idea how to solve the issue?

No response

What is your configuration?
The backend configuration is extremely straightforward:

backend BKND
    balance uri whole
    hash-type consistent
    option httpchk GET /hcheck HTTP/1.1
    http-check send hdr X-Check check
    default-server inter 6s fastinter 2s fall 3 rise 5 maxconn 256
    server foo1.bar X.X.X.X:80 check weight 1
    server foo2.bar X.X.X.Y:80 check weight 2
    server foo3.bar X.X.X.Z:80 check weight 3

Some things that could be relevant:

    option                  redispatch
    option                  abortonclose
    retries                 3
    option idle-close-on-response
    http-reuse always
Output of haproxy -vv
This are in-house built packages, here's the relevant output from haproxy -vv (redacted a bit of sensitive output):

`HAProxy version 3.4.1-3e888a769 2026/06/25 - https://haproxy.org/
Status: long-term supported branch - will stop receiving fixes around Q2 2031.
Known bugs: http://www.haproxy.org/bugs/bugs-3.4.1.html
Build options : 
  TARGET  = linux-glibc
  CC      = cc
  CFLAGS  = -O2 -g -fwrapv
  OPTIONS = USE_GETADDRINFO=1 USE_OPENSSL_AWSLC=1 USE_ZLIB=1 USE_TFO=1 USE_NS=1 USE_QUIC=1 USE_PCRE=1 USE_PCRE_JIT=1 USE_KTLS=1
  DEBUG   = 

Feature list : -51DEGREES +ACCEPT4 +ACME +BACKTRACE -CLOSEFROM +CPU_AFFINITY +CRYPT_H -DEVICEATLAS +DL -ECH -ENGINE +EPOLL -EVPORTS +GETADDRINFO +HAVE_TCP_MD5SIG -KQUEUE +KTLS -LIBATOMIC +LIBCRYPT +LINUX_CAP +LINUX_SPLICE +LINUX_TPROXY -LUA -MATH -MEMORY_PROFILING +NETFILTER +NS -OBSOLETE_LINKER +OPENSSL +OPENSSL_AWSLC -OPENSSL_WOLFSSL -OT +PCRE -PCRE2 -PCRE2_JIT +PCRE_JIT +POLL +PRCTL -PROCCTL -PROMEX -PTHREAD_EMULATION +QUIC -QUIC_OPENSSL_COMPAT +RT +SHM_OPEN -SLZ +SSL -STATIC_PCRE -STATIC_PCRE2 +TFO +THREAD +THREAD_DUMP +TPROXY +TRACE -WURFL +ZLIB
Detected feature list : +HAVE_WORKING_TCP_MD5SIG
`
Last Outputs and Backtraces

Additional Information

No response

主要语言
C
星标
6.9k
派生
976
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

haproxy/haproxy 的其他 Issue

查看 haproxy/haproxy 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。