Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

flow-controlled client streams can be leaked when the server half-closes

已关闭
#13,078 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
70/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
grpc, java

调研方向

Start in NettyClientStream.java around the server half-close handling at lines 344-347, then trace AbstractClientStream.isOutboundClosed() and halfClose() under an exhausted control window. Run the standalone reproducer with ./gradlew run; done means completed client-streaming calls no longer leave HTTP/2 streams open or exhaust MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

When the server half-closes, NettyClientStream attempts to cancel the stream if the client has not half-closed: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/blob/4d0d548ea050d002c66573a30785f14bdfd41bea/netty/src/main/java/io/grpc/netty/NettyClientStream.java#L344-L347 However, AbstractClientStream.isOutboundClosed() reflects whether the application has called AbstractClientStream.halfClose() not whether the end-of-stream has actually been sent. The end-of-stream flag may never be sent if the control flow window is exhausted. This can prevent streams that would normally have terminated from ever dying.

A standalone reproduction of this bug is available at https://github.com/benjaminp/grpc_stream_leak_bug. The reproducer uses a client-streaming RPC. The client writes a large amount of data in a series of messages while the server implementation sleeps to allow the client to fill the control window and then replies with its unary response. Because of the bug, each call leaves the stream open. After making several calls, the client exhausts MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS and can no longer make calls.

$ ./gradlew run
> Task :run
client: launching server: leak-demo-client/bin/leak-demo-server
client: server pid=254266 port=38687
client: creating channel
client: call 0: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 0: OK, server read 16384
client: call 1: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 1: OK, server read 16384
client: call 2: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 2: OK, server read 16384
client: call 3: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 3: failed: Status{code=DEADLINE_EXCEEDED, description=CallOptions deadline exceeded after 4.999898215s. Name resolution delay 0.000000000 seconds. [closed=[], committed=[remote_addr=/127.0.0.1:38687]], cause=null}
client: call 4: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 4: failed: Status{code=DEADLINE_EXCEEDED, description=CallOptions deadline exceeded after 4.999914485s. Name resolution delay 0.000000000 seconds. [closed=[], committed=[remote_addr=/127.0.0.1:38687]], cause=null}
client: call 5: sending 1064960 bytes
client: call 5: failed: Status{code=DEADLINE_EXCEEDED, description=CallOptions deadline exceeded after 4.999885146s. Name resolution delay 0.000000000 seconds. [closed=[], committed=[remote_addr=/127.0.0.1:38687]], cause=null}
BUG: 3 of 6 calls failed even though every earlier call completed OK; the completed calls' HTTP/2 streams were never closed and exhausted the server's MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=3
主要语言
Java
星标
12.1k
派生
4k
平均合并
2 天 13 小时
30 天内合并 PR
41

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

grpc/grpc-java 的其他 Issue

查看 grpc/grpc-java 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。