Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[curriculum-eval] curriculum_assessment.py: checkpoint_quality — regex misses :white_check_mark: shortcode, 92/94 pages falsely flagged

已关闭 适合新手
#4,969 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
85/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python
领域
tooling

调研方向

阅读 .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py 并定位 CHECKPOINT_RE 和 prereq regex。按照描述更新它们以同时匹配 emoji 和 GitHub shortcode 标题形式,然后针对 workshop/ 重新运行评估,并确认 04-github-actions-intro.md 的 has_checkpoint 在语料库均值上升时为 true。为两种标题形式添加单元测试。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

curriculum documentation quality

File: .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py
Overall Score: corpus mean 6.06 / 10.0 (depressed by scorer defect)

Flagged Dimensions:

Dimension Score Benchmark Delta
checkpoint_quality 0.0 on 92/94 pages ≥ 7.5 −7.5
scaffolding 5.0 on most pages 10 −5.0

Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
CHECKPOINT_RE matches ##\s+✅\s*Checkpoint and the prerequisite check matches ##\s+📋\s*Before You Start, but workshop files write these headings with GitHub shortcodes (## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint, ## :clipboard: Before You Start). Every page is therefore scored as missing both, which drags scores by about 2–3 points and triggers missing_checkpoint on 92 of 94 pages.

Evidence (quoted from the file):

workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md line 138: ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint followed by 5 checklist items — yet its metrics report has_checkpoint: false, checkpoint_quality: 0.0.

Scorer: CHECKPOINT_RE = re.compile(r"##\s+✅\s*Checkpoint", re.IGNORECASE)

Learning Science Rationale:
Valid measurement underpins any evidence-based review: a rubric with a systematic false negative produces misleading prioritisation (for example, the −2.00 "declines" on side-quest-11-09 and side-quest-12-01 likely reflect heading-format changes rather than learning quality). Fixing the detector lets Cognitive Load, Mayer's segmenting and retrieval-practice signals (checkpoints) be evaluated on real differences.

Improvement Prompt (for an agent):

In .github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/curriculum_assessment.py, update CHECKPOINT_RE to match both the emoji and shortcode forms, e.g. r"##\s+(?:✅|:white_check_mark:)\s*Checkpoint", and update the has_prereq_section regex to match r"##\s+(?:📋|:clipboard:)\s*Before You Start" (also accept a "Prerequisites" heading). Also check CHECKLIST_RE and any other emoji-dependent patterns for shortcode equivalents. Re-run the assessment against workshop/ and confirm has_checkpoint is true for 04-github-actions-intro.md and that corpus mean rises. Add a small unit test covering both heading forms.

Expected Score After Fix: ~8.3 / 10.0 corpus mean (checkpoint +2.0 weight × ~8 and scaffolding +1.5 × 5 on most pages)

Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · ~42 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 5K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 26, 2026, 5:07 AM UTC
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
56
派生
40
平均合并
2 天 7 小时
30 天内合并 PR
16

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的其他 Issue

查看 githubnext/gh-aw-workshop 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。