Copilot agentic-workflows catalog lacks the 5.5 Claude models an org's seats have; docs should steer to aliases
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 82/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- github-actions, go
调研方向
阅读 docs/src/content/docs/reference/engines.md 中的“Model aliases”部分,以及 docs/src/content/docs/reference/model-tables.md 中相关的表格。补充说明:工作流可用的 Copilot 目录可能不同于组织的席位配置;建议使用 opus 和 sonnet 别名,而非精确 ID;并在两个页面都添加指向该说明的链接。完成标准是:两个页面都说明,缺失的精确 ID 不会提供给该工作流,并指出可在本次运行的 agent 产物中的 sandbox/firewall/awf-reflect.json 查看实时目录。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Copilot agentic-workflows catalog lacks the 5.5 Claude models an org's seats have; docs should steer to aliases
Analysis
A pi workflow with model: copilot/claude-opus-5.5 compiles on v0.93.2, which even embeds pricing for the model, but it fails at agent startup:
model resolution: engine=pi role=main configured=copilot/claude-opus-5.5 resolved=claude-opus-5.5 provider=copilot status=exact
fatal: Pi model "claude-opus-5.5" is not advertised by the configured copilot proxy endpoint; ... not available in the workflow's live model catalog. For Copilot, availability also depends on the agentic-workflows integration, not just organization policy.
In the same run, the workflow's awf-reflect.json lists only these Claude models: claude-haiku-4.5, claude-opus-4.8, claude-opus-5 and claude-sonnet-5. Our organization's Copilot seats use claude-opus-5.5 and claude-sonnet-5.5 every day.
daily-model-inventory (#71961) lists the 5.5 models as live. That inventory reflects the catalog gh-aw's own repository is offered, so users have no way to learn that their workflows may be offered less.
model: opus resolves to claude-opus-5 today and works. It is the portable choice.
Question for the core team
Can the agentic-workflows integration offer the 5.5 Claude models to organizations whose seats have them? Is there a documented rule or timeline?
Implementation plan (docs)
- In
docs/src/content/docs/reference/engines.md, under "Model aliases", add a note:- the Copilot catalog offered to a workflow can differ by organization and lag the organization's seats;
- prefer aliases (
opus,sonnet) over exact Copilot IDs; - to see the actual catalog, read
sandbox/firewall/awf-reflect.jsonin the run'sagentartifact.
- In
docs/src/content/docs/reference/model-tables.md, add one line to the same effect, linking to that note.
Acceptance: both pages carry the note. An exact Copilot ID that is missing from the catalog is explained as "not offered to this workflow", with aliases recommended.
Environment
gh-aw v0.93.2, AWF 0.28.70, Pi 1.3.0, runner.topology: arc-dind, copilot-requests: write. The repository is a private organization repository.
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 5.5k
- 派生
- 606
- 平均合并
- 4 小时 35 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 807
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/gh-aw 的其他 Issue
-
automation doc-healer documentation
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent-research
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
automation cookie
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agentic-workflows automation aw-essential cookie
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
automated-analysis code-quality cookie refactoring
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
lognorman20/monaco#7428 ·
-
docs(prompts): IF BLOCKED workflow-scope branch says to comment on the issue on jira/local trackers未关闭agent-butler-finding bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 77/100
jordansmall/spindrift#6238 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
microcks/microcks-cli#608 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug from-studio
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix#14868 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复