Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Dependabot - Private "Registries"/"Dependencies"/"Repositories" is misleading

未关闭 适合新手
#45,681 6 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
1/5
预计耗时
1 小时以内
新手友好度
82/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
github
领域
documentation

调研方向

阅读 docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/supply-chain-security/supported-ecosystems-and-repositories 中受影响的文章，重点关注“Private Registries”、“Private Dependencies”和“Private Repositories”这三处用法。统一术语，明确私有依赖项和私有仓库的范围，然后检查渲染后的文章，确保措辞一致。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

content dependabot needs SME
Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/supply-chain-security/supported-ecosystems-and-repositories

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

Dependabot sometimes cannot resolve private dependencies for some ecosystems (e.g. Nix, currently)

However, this is expressed in 3 different expressions:

  1. Private Registries
  2. Private Dependencies
  3. Private Repositories

Those can be misleading

For example:
I personally thought dependabot was completely not working for some ecosystems independently of private dependencies when the dependabot.yml file was inside of a private repository

Harmonizing the "Private *" term with a single word (probably "Private Dependencies", since it encompasses both registries and repositories) would have cleared up any confusion

Additional information

No response

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
20.9k
派生
68.8k
平均合并
13 小时 43 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
110

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

github/docs 的其他 Issue

查看 github/docs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。