[v2] Complete in-process lifecycle and platform reliability work
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- rust, sqlite
调研方向
首先阅读 #1934,并确定 #1976、#1983、#1986 和 #2272 已经解决了什么问题。重现剩余的 Windows in-process CI、force-stop、session-disposal 以及 SQLite 关闭行为,然后将 graceful shutdown 与 out-of-process 运行进行对比测量。完成的标准是:具备可靠的 SDK 覆盖、teardown 和资源释放的回归测试、经过论证的不支持组合,以及 maintainer 对所有未实现内容的认可。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
Complete the remaining in-process runtime lifecycle and platform reliability work required for v2.
These are tracked jobs from #1934, not optional investigation topics. First establish what existing work has already completed, then implement the remainder. If new evidence shows an item no longer applies, document it and obtain maintainer confirmation before closing it without implementation.
Original concerns
- Windows in-process CI legs for .NET and Rust were disabled because of a
napi-oopcleanup race. The race was thought unlikely to affect real applications, but the CI legs still needed to be re-enabled and teardown shown to be robust after removingnapi-oop. - The underlying runtime did not close SQLite connections after
forceStop, and possibly not after session disposal. This left locked files on Windows. - Graceful SQLite shutdown was suspected of being slow. This was the leading hypothesis in #1934 for in-process CI legs taking approximately 25–50% longer than their out-of-process equivalents.
Required outcomes
- The intended Windows in-process CI coverage is enabled and reliable across SDKs.
- Callback and teardown behavior remains robust after the
napi-oopcleanup work. - Force-stop and session disposal release SQLite connections and do not leave locked files on Windows.
- Graceful shutdown does not have unexplained material performance regressions relative to out-of-process operation.
- Any intentionally unsupported platform or test combination is explicitly justified and documented.
Implementation preparation
- Establish what #1976, #1983, #1986, and #2272 already resolved.
- Reproduce and test any remaining lifecycle or shutdown failures.
- Confirm whether SQLite closure is SDK-owned or requires changes in
github/copilot-cli, and link the required runtime work. - Measure shutdown behavior sufficiently to confirm or reject the SQLite performance hypothesis.
- Escalate for maintainer direction if an external runtime defect cannot reasonably be completed for v2.
Historical context
- #1934
- #1976
- #1983
- #1986
- #2272
Completion
Deliver the required coverage, teardown, resource-release, and shutdown behavior with reliable regression tests. Any item not implemented requires documented contradictory evidence and explicit maintainer agreement.
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 10.5k
- 派生
- 1.5k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 130
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/copilot-sdk 的其他 Issue
-
agentic-workflows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2760 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2759 ·
-
documentation
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
github/copilot-sdk#2758 ·
-
agentic-workflows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
github/copilot-sdk#2709 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 78/100
github/copilot-sdk#2673 ·
查看 github/copilot-sdk 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
awaiting triage bug Causes friction Hop Gui P1 P2 Transforms
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
apache/flink-agents#1152 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
jenkinsci/blueocean-plugin#5417 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
objectionary/eo-graphs#75 ·